Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38181016›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Prognostic model for survival in patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix: SEER database analysis and a single-center retrospective study.

Caixian Yu, Xiaoliu Wu, Shao Zhang, Lan Zhang, Hongping Zhang, Hongying Yang, Min Zhao, Zheng Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caixian YuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital/Yunnan Cancer Center), Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-4224-7795
Xiaoliu WuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital/Yunnan Cancer Center), Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.
Shao ZhangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital/Yunnan Cancer Center), Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.
Lan ZhangDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital/Yunnan Cancer Center), Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.
Hongping ZhangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital/Yunnan Cancer Center), Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.
Hongying YangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital/Yunnan Cancer Center), Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.
Min ZhaoMedical Administration Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital/Yunnan Cancer Center), Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.
Zheng LiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (Yunnan Cancer Hospital/Yunnan Cancer Center), Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-6141-4990
Kunming Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) is extremely rare in clinical practice. This study aimed to methodologically analyze the clinicopathological factors associated with NECC patients and to develop a validated survival prediction model.

methodsA total of 535 patients diagnosed with NECC between 2004 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, while 122 patients diagnosed with NECC at Yunnan Cancer Hospital (YCH) from 2006 to 2019 were also recruited. Patients from the SEER database were divided into a training cohort (n = 376) and a validation cohort (n = 159) in a 7:3 ratio for the construction and internal validation of the nomogram. External validation was performed in a cohort at YCH. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, the Log-rank method test was used for univariate analysis of prognostic influences, and the Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis.

resultsThe 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with NECC in SEER were 43.6% and 39.7%, respectively. In the training cohort, multivariate analysis showed independent prognostic factors for NECC patients including race, tumor size, distant metastasis, stage, and chemotherapy (p<0.05). For extended application in other cohorts, a nomogram including four factors without race was subsequently created. The consistency index (C-index) of the nomogram predicting survival was 0.736, which was well-validated in the validation cohorts (0.746 for the internal validation cohort and 0.765 for the external validation cohort). In both the training and validation cohorts, the 3-year survival rates predicted by the nomogram were comparable to the actual ones. We then succeeded in dividing patients with NECC into high- and low-risk groups concerning OS using the nomogram we developed. Besides, univariate analysis showed that chemotherapy ≥4 cycles may improve the OS of patients at YCH with NECC.

conclusionWe successfully constructed a nomogram that precisely predicts the OS for patients with NECC based on the SEER database and a large single-center retrospective cohort. The visualized and practical model can distinguish high-risk patients for recurrence and death who may benefit from clinical trials of boost therapy effectively. We also found that patients who received more than 4 cycles of chemotherapy acquired survival benefits than those who received less than 4 cycles.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervix UteriChinaFemaleHumansPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38181016
PMCPMC10769015
OpenAlexW4390604914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.