ArticlePloS one2024
Supervised diagnostic classification of cognitive attributes using data augmentation.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over recent decades, machine learning, an integral subfield of artificial intelligence, has revolutionized diverse sectors, enabling data-driven decisions with minimal human intervention. In particular, the field of educational assessment emerges as a promising area for machine learning applications, where students can be classified and diagnosed using their performance data. The objectives of Diagnostic Classification Models (DCMs), which provide a suite of methods for diagnosing students' cognitive states in relation to the mastery of necessary cognitive attributes for solving problems in a test, can be effectively addressed through machine learning techniques. However, the challenge lies in the latent nature of cognitive status, which makes it difficult to obtain labels for the training dataset. Consequently, the application of machine learning methods to DCMs often assumes smaller training sets with labels derived either from theoretical considerations or human experts. In this study, the authors propose a supervised diagnostic classification model with data augmentation (SDCM-DA). This method is designed to utilize the augmented data using a data generation model constructed by leveraging the probability of correct responses for each attribute mastery pattern derived from the expert-labeled dataset. To explore the benefits of data augmentation, a simulation study is carried out, contrasting it with classification methods that rely solely on the expert-labeled dataset for training. The findings reveal that utilizing data augmentation with the estimated probabilities of correct responses substantially enhances classification accuracy. This holds true even when the augmentation originates from a small labeled sample with occasional labeling errors, and when the tests contain lower-quality items that may inaccurately measure students' true cognitive status. Moreover, the study demonstrates that leveraging augmented data for learning can enable the successful classification of students, thereby eliminating the necessity for specifying an underlying response model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.