ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Rapid human genomic DNA cloning into mouse artificial chromosome via direct chromosome transfer from human iPSC and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated translocation.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic landscape of synthetic human centromere core regions: CENP-A assembly and euchromatic modifications interdependently antagonize heterochromatin accumulation.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Resurrection of chromosomes from frozen animals by single chromosome transfer into mouse oocytes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Generation of Monosomy 21q Human iPS Cells by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Interstitial Megabase Deletion.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2025Article
- Microcell-mediated chromosome transfer between non-identical human iPSCs.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024Article
- Versatile plant genome engineering using anti-CRISPR-Cas12a systems.Science China. Life sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A 'genomically' humanized animal stably maintains and functionally expresses the genes on human chromosome fragment (hCF; <24 Mb) loaded onto mouse artificial chromosome (MAC); however, cloning of hCF onto the MAC (hCF-MAC) requires a complex process that involves multiple steps of chromosome engineering through various cells via chromosome transfer and Cre-loxP chromosome translocation. Here, we aimed to develop a strategy to rapidly construct the hCF-MAC by employing three alternative techniques: (i) application of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) as chromosome donors for microcell-mediated chromosome transfer (MMCT), (ii) combination of paclitaxel (PTX) and reversine (Rev) as micronucleation inducers and (iii) CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for site-specific translocations. We achieved a direct transfer of human chromosome 6 or 21 as a model from hiPSCs as alternative human chromosome donors into CHO cells containing MAC. MMCT was performed with less toxicity through induction of micronucleation by PTX and Rev. Furthermore, chromosome translocation was induced by simultaneous cleavage between human chromosome and MAC by using CRISPR/Cas9, resulting in the generation of hCF-MAC containing CHO clones without Cre-loxP recombination and drug selection. Our strategy facilitates rapid chromosome cloning and also contributes to the functional genomic analyses of human chromosomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.