Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38180798›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

Usability of an App for Medical History Taking in General Practice From the Patients' Perspective: Cross-Sectional Study.

Klara Albrink, Dominik Schröder, Carla Joos, Frank Müller, Eva Maria Noack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Klara AlbrinkDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-3773-9377
Dominik SchröderDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-4725
Carla JoosDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-8994-9491
Frank MüllerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9496-9423
Eva Maria NoackDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1267-6484

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA future shortage of physicians, especially in general practice, will result in an increasing workload for health care providers as a whole. Therefore, it is important to optimize patient-encounter processes to increase time efficiency related to visits. Utilizing digital tools to record patients' medical histories prior to a consultation offers great potential to achieve this goal. The collected information can be stored into the practice's electronic medical record, allowing for the general practitioner to review structured information of the patients' complaints and related medical history beforehand, thereby saving time during the encounter. However, the low usability of new digital developments in this setting often hinders implementation.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the usability of an app designed for medical history taking in general practice to capture the patients' perspective.

methodsBetween November 2021 and January 2022, we recruited 406 patients with acute complaints in one out-of-hour urgent care and seven general practice clinics. These study participants used the app during their waiting time and subsequently assessed its usability by completing the System Usability Scale (SUS), a robust and well-established 10-question survey measuring the perceived usability of products and technologies. Additionally, we collected general participant information, including age, sex, media usage, health literacy, and native language. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to identify patient characteristics associated with low or high SUS scores.

resultsWe analyzed data from 397 patients (56.7% female, 43.3% male). The mean total SUS score was 77.8 points; 54.4% (216/397) of participants had SUS scores of 80 points or higher, indicating high usability of the app. In a multiple linear regression predicting SUS score, male sex and higher age (65 years or older) were significantly negatively associated with the SUS score. Conversely, a higher health literacy score and German as the native language were significantly positively associated with the SUS score.

conclusionsUsability testing based on the SUS anticipates successful implementation of the app. However, not all patients will easily adapt to utilizing the app, as exemplified by the participants of older age in this study who reported lower perceived usability. Further research should examine these groups of people, identify the exact problems in operating such an app, and provide targeted solutions.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set DRKS00026659; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00026659.

Indexed as

General PracticeMedical History TakingMobile ApplicationsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleapplication softwaredigitizationhistory of present illnessmedical history takingmHealthusability

Identifiers

PMID38180798
PMCPMC10799287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.