ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024
Stage 3 N2 Lung Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Conundrum.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07538193 (A Study of Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab in Combination With Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Stage III-N2b Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study of Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab in Combination With Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Stage III-N2b Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemoimmunotherapy improves surgical resection rate and survival versus chemotherapy in potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world propensity score-matched study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Assessing current diagnostic, staging, and treatment practices in community and academic centers for individuals with stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Association between treatment decisions and survival outcomes in lung cancer patients under a multidisciplinary team model: the impact of MDT-recommended treatment plans on treatment completion rates, survival time, and treatment conversion.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- State of the art of perioperative assessment in early non-small-cell lung cancer in Poland in the emerging era of perioperative protocols.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicles as prognostic biomarkers: results of a neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy clinical trial in stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (SAKK 16/14).Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): staging, techniques, and future directions.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Review
- Long-term outcomes of surgery in resectable single-station N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2025Article
- The impact of extent of nodal involvement on stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer outcomes.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Molecular Biology of Cancer-Interplay of Malignant Cells with Emerging Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A Single-Center Experience in Combined Oncological-Surgical Treatment for Resectable Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advances in adjuvant therapy for operable N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- The role of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy in stage III NSCLC.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2024Review
- Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Resectability in a Country With Limited Diagnostic and Therapeutic Resources: A Colombian Expert Consensus.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe treatment of stage III N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains debated. There is an absence of a universally agreed definition of resectability for this heterogeneous group and a lack of trial data. RECENT
findingsWe reviewed and compared current international guidelines and evidence surrounding management of stage III N2 NSCLC. The Irish and Australian guidelines advise subcategorising N2 disease into N2a (may be resectable) and N2b (never resectable). On the contrary, American and British guidelines avoid subcategorising N2 disease, emphasising importance of local MDT decisions. It is suggested that evidence for resection of stage III tumours is relatively weak, but that stage IIIA should generally be considered for resection, and stage IIIB is not recommended for resection. For resectable disease, surgery may be combined with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, or adjuvant chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy and radiotherapy in selected patients. There is some evidence that technically resectable disease can be treated solely with radiotherapy with similar outcomes to resection. In the event of unresectable disease, chemoradiotherapy has been the traditional management option. However, recent studies with chemoradiotherapy alongside immunotherapy appear promising. There are many factors that influence the treatment pathway offered to patients with stage III N2 NSCLC, including patient factors, team expertise, and local resources. Therefore, the role of MDTs in defining resectability and formulating an individualised treatment plan is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.