Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38180686›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2024

Understanding current experimental models of glioblastoma-brain microenvironment interactions.

Niket Yadav, Benjamin W Purow

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. About the incompleteness of our models.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niket YadavDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Benjamin W PurowDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA. bwp5g@uvahealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-6062
University of Virginia Health System · US

Funding

Cancer Research Training Program: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic StrategiesT32CA009109 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Andrew Carl Dudley, Melanie R Rutkowski · 1985 to 2026
$13.9M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007267 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI GARCIA-BLANCO, MARIANO A. · 1985 to 2024
$13.4M
Systems Analysis of Stress-adapted Cancer Organelles (SASCO) CenterU54CA274499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes · 2022 to 2026
$13.4M
Vulnerabilities of MMR-deficient glioblastomaR01NS124787 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Benjamin W. Purow · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Novel immunotherapeutic potential of DGKalpha inhibition for glioblastomaR01NS126265 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Benjamin W. Purow · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Interdisciplinary Training in Systems & Biomolecular Data ScienceT32GM145443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes, Jason Papin · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009109NCI NIH HHS U54 CA274499NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007267NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145443NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124787NINDS NIH HHS R01NS124787NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS126265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a common and devastating primary brain tumor, with median survival of 16-18 months after diagnosis in the setting of substantial resistance to standard-of-care and inevitable tumor recurrence. Recent work has implicated the brain microenvironment as being critical for GBM proliferation, invasion, and resistance to treatment. GBM does not operate in isolation, with neurons, astrocytes, and multiple immune populations being implicated in GBM tumor progression and invasiveness. The goal of this review article is to provide an overview of the available in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experimental models for assessing GBM-brain interactions, as well as discuss each model's relative strengths and limitations. Current in vitro models discussed will include 2D and 3D co-culture platforms with various cells of the brain microenvironment, as well as spheroids, whole organoids, and models of fluid dynamics, such as interstitial flow. An overview of in vitro and ex vivo organotypic GBM brain slices is also provided. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the various in vivo rodent models of GBM, including xenografts, syngeneic grafts, and genetically-engineered models of GBM.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBrainCell Line, TumorHumansModels, TheoreticalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTumor MicroenvironmentGBM modelsGlioblastomaTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38180686
PMCPMC11056965
OpenAlexW4390614418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.