Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38180635›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Neonatal hypoglycemia and neurodevelopmental outcomes: Yesterday, today, tomorrow.

Domenico Umberto De Rose, Alessandro Perri, Luca Maggio, Guglielmo Salvatori, Andrea Dotta, Giovanni Vento, Francesca Gallini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Improving timing of early neonatal hypoglycemia screening in the well-baby nursery.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Intrapartum Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Domenico Umberto De Rose *Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, "Bambino Gesù" Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy. domenico.derose@opbg.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9076-9838
Alessandro Perri *Neonatology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luca MaggioUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Guglielmo SalvatoriNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, "Bambino Gesù" Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea DottaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, "Bambino Gesù" Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni VentoNeonatology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesca GalliniUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal hypoglycemia is a major source of concern for pediatricians since it has commonly been related to poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. Diagnosis is challenging, considering the different operational thresholds provided by each guideline. Screening of infants at risk plays a crucial role, considering that most hypoglycemic infants show no clinical signs. New opportunities for prevention and treatment are provided by the use of oral dextrose gel. Continuous glucose monitoring systems could be a feasible tool in the next future. Furthermore, there is still limited evidence to underpin the current clinical practice of administering, in case of hypoglycemia, an intravenous "mini-bolus" of 10% dextrose before starting a continuous dextrose infusion. This brief review provides an overview of the latest advances in this field and neurodevelopmental outcomes according to different approaches.   Conclusion: To adequately define if a more permissive approach is risk-free for neurodevelopmental outcomes, more research on continuous glucose monitoring and long-term follow-up is still needed. What is Known: • Neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) is a well-known cause of brain injury that could be prevented to avoid neurodevelopmental impairment. • Diagnosis is challenging, considering the different suggested operational thresholds for NH (<36, <40, <45, <47 or <50 mg/dl). What is New: • A 36 mg/dl threshold seems to be not associated with a worse psychomotor development at 18 months of life when compared to the "traditional" threshold (47 mg/dl). • Further studies on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes are required before suggesting a more permissive management of NH.

Indexed as

HypoglycemiaInfant, Newborn, DiseasesBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringGelsGlucoseHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInfantInfant, NewbornBlood GlucoseGelsGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsContinuous glucose monitoringGlucoseNewbornThreshold

Identifiers

PMID38180635
OpenAlexW4390608514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.