ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024
Effect of Trabeculodescemetic Window Perforation in Deep Sclerectomy on Intraocular Pressure in Primary Congenital Glaucoma.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of Trabeculo-Descemet's Membrane Microperforation During Combined Phacoemulsification and Deep Sclerectomy.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrimary congenital glaucoma causes vision loss if intraocular pressure is uncontrolled. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy is effective in treating primary congenital glaucoma. However, the effects of inadvertent trabeculodescemetic window perforation remain unclear.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients with primary congenital glaucoma who underwent nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy between 2014 and 2021. The perforation group had intraoperative trabeculodescemetic window perforations; the non-perforation group did not. The primary outcome was intraocular pressure between the groups over 15 months. The secondary outcomes included surgical success and complications.
resultsThe study included 74 eyes of 44 patients. The cohort comprised 31 perforated and 43 non-perforated eyes. Both groups showed significant intraocular pressure reduction without significant between-group differences in complete (68 vs. 77%), qualified (19 vs. 9%), or failed (13 vs. 14%) treatments. The median intraocular pressure decreased from 39 to 14 mmHg in the perforation group and 35 to 12 mmHg in the non-perforation group. Of the 74 treated eyes, 68 (92%) showed no complications.
conclusionsAn inadvertent trabeculodescemetic window perforation during nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy for primary congenital glaucoma did not significantly affect intraocular pressure outcomes compared to non-perforated cases over 15 months. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy reduced intraocular pressure regardless of intraoperative perforation in patients with primary congenital glaucoma. Perforation of the trabeculodescemetic window was associated with a low incidence of postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.