ArticleCVIR endovascular2024
Is it a complication or a consequence - a new perspective on adverse outcomes in Interventional Radiology.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid intervention with angio-CT for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD).Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Diagnostic Yield and Complication Risk in CT-Guided Transthoracic Lung Biopsy of Pulmonary Lesions: A Retrospective Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of Technical Standardization on Pneumothorax and Chest Tube Insertion Rates: A Retrospective Learning Curve Analysis of CT-Guided Lung Biopsies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Determinants of Health-Related Quality of Life After Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Commentary Discussing the Overlooked Domains of Complications, Adverse Events, and Quality Improvement in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the article is to introduce a new term in post-procedural events related to the procedure itself. All the Societies and Councils report these events as complications and they are divided in mild, moderate and severe or immediate and delayed.On the other hand the term error is known as the application of a wrong plan, or strategy to achieve a goal.For the first time, we are trying to introduce the term "consequence"; assuming that the procedure is the only available and the best fit to clinical indication, a consequence should be seen as an expected and unavoidable occurrence of an "adverse event" despite correct technical execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.