ArticleHuman genetics2024
Genomic analysis of presumed perinatal stroke in Saudi Arabia reveals a strong monogenic contribution.
Article in Human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic Refinement of ESAM-Related Tight-Junctionopathy: Novel Genetic and Ocular Findings and Literature Review.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026Review
- Novel homozygous ESAM variants in two families with perinatal strokes showing variable neuroradiologic and clinical findings.Journal of human genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perinatal stroke is associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity and has been recognized as the most common cause of cerebral palsy in term infants. The diagnosis of presumed perinatal stroke (PPS) is made in children who present with neurological deficit and/or seizures attributable to focal chronic infarction on neuroimaging and have uneventful neonatal history. The underlying mechanism of presumed perinatal stroke remains unknown and thorough investigation of potential monogenic causes has not been conducted to date. Here, we describe the use of untargeted exome sequencing to investigate a cohort of eight patients from six families with PPS. A likely deleterious variant was identified in four families. These include the well-established risk genes COL4A2 and JAM3. In addition, we report the first independent confirmation of the recently described link between ESAM and perinatal stroke. Our data also highlight NID1 as a candidate gene for the condition. This study suggests that monogenic disorders are important contributors to the pathogenesis of PPS and should be investigated by untargeted sequencing especially when traditional risk factors are excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.