ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Imaging after kidney transplantation in childhood and adolescence].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- B-flow imaging in abdominal ultrasound: a pictorial essay.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Review
- Understanding Pediatric Kidney Transplant Rejection: Its Pathophysiology, Biomarkers, and Management Strategies.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Deep learning in renal ultrasound: applications, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ultrasound (US) examination is the most important imaging procedure in the clinical care of children with chronic kidney disease, the assessment before kidney transplantation and in the acute and chronic phase after successful kidney transplantation. In trained hands, particularly with experience in Doppler sonography, US ensures that vascular complications, such as occlusions, thrombosis, stenosis as well as non-vascular complications, e.g., urinary tract dilatation, abscesses, hematomas, urine leaks or lymphoceles, are cost-effectively and rapidly diagnosed at any time. For the diagnosis of acute rejection, the US signs in the intraindividual course are only suggestive, but not specific. The gold standard for the diagnosis of acute rejection is a kidney biopsy. In these cases, US serves to exclude other causes. The use of multimodal techniques, various Doppler techniques and microvascular procedures, such as superb microvascular imaging (SMI) or B‑flow and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), optimizes the imaging in the context of transplantations in children. Magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighed imaging (DWI), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and magnetic resonance urography (MRU) as well as functional MRU (fMRU) performed with the administration of gadolinium-containing contrast agents, are part of the extended diagnostics and possibly necessary for surgical planning in the early phase after kidney transplantation and for long-term assessment after transplantation. Excretory urography is associated with ionizing radiation and intravenous administration of iodine-containing contrast medium and is obsolete in children. Computed tomography (CT) using age-adapted and weight-adapted dose protocols is an alternative in emergencies if MRI is not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.