Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179676›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease

Liver injury due to endothelin receptor antagonists: a real-world study based on post-marketing drug monitoring data.

Shichao Dong, Xiaofei Guo, Huayu Wang, Chuan Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shichao DongDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2043-7942
Xiaofei GuoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Huayu WangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Chuan SunDepartment of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, No. 72, Guangzhou road, Gulou District, Jiangsu 210000, China.
Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University · CNHarbin Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver injury is the hallmark adverse reaction of endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA). Since the first drug, bosentan has been widely used in clinical practice, hepatotoxicity has been accompanied by the history of ERA. The new ERA has been proven to have a lower liver risk but the current research findings are inconsistent. ERA-based targeted drug combinations are commonly used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, where the risk of liver injury is difficult to estimate.

objectivesThis study aimed to compare the correlation between ERA and different ERA combination regimens with liver injury in the real world.

designThis is a retrospective study using data from the Adverse Event Reporting System (Food and Drug Administration AERS, FAERS).

methodsThe study used proportional imbalance and Bayesian analysis to mine FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 to determine the association of three ERAs with liver injury and to further mine the risk of liver injury due to the combination of ERAs with other targeted drugs. In addition, we analyzed the onset time, mortality, and hospitalization rate of liver injury caused by different ERA combination regimens.

resultsWe screened out 3581 ERA-related liver injury events, of which bosentan (59.82%) had the largest number of cases. The patients with liver injury were mainly female (60.63%), and the age was concentrated between 61 and 75 years (26.75%). According to different signal mining methods, reporting odds ratio (ROR; 3.38, 95% confidence interval = 3.23-3.53), proportional reporting ratio (PRR; 3.22,

conclusionBy mining the FAERS, we analyzed and compared the risk of liver injury related to different ERA and ERA combination regimens, and the onset time and adverse reaction outcomes of all ERA combination regimens. According to the results of the study, bosentan had the highest risk of liver injury and the combination regimens bosentan + sildenafil, bosentan + epoprostenol, and bosentan + iloprost had a stronger risk of liver injury. From the early stages of treatment, we need to regularly monitor the liver function of patients, especially for females and the elderly, and discontinue the suspected drug as soon as the liver injury occurs.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryHypertension, PulmonaryAgedBayes TheoremBosentanDrug MonitoringEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsEpoprostenolFemaleHumansIloprostMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSildenafil CitrateBosentanEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsEpoprostenolIloprostSildenafil Citrateadverse event reporting systemcombination regimensdata miningendothelin receptor antagonisthepatotoxicityliver injuryonset timeoutcomepulmonary arterial hypertension

Identifiers

PMID38179676
PMCPMC10771067
OpenAlexW4390614966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.