ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Navigating misinformation and political polarization of COVID-19: interviews with Milwaukee, Wisconsin county public health officials.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Experiences of Public Health Professionals Regarding Crisis Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring Attitudes and Obstacles Around Digital Public Health Tools: Insights From a Statewide Cross-Sectional Survey on Washington's Vaccine Verification System.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The spread of misinformation combined with the political polarization of the COVID-19 vaccine created major challenges for public health officials responding to the COVID pandemic and vaccine roll-out. The challenges public health officials faced when making safety recommendations and promoting the vaccine only exacerbated the already exhausting work conditions they experienced since the start of the pandemic. Combating misinformation while receiving inadequate political support led to burnout for many public health officials. As such, they had to adapt and develop new strategies for increasing vaccine acceptance and decreasing vaccine hesitancies. Method: This study was conducted through qualitative interviews with seven Milwaukee County public health officials. This study aimed to determine how public health officials perceived misinformation and political polarization during the pandemic. Additionally, the study aimed to learn more about strategies county health officials used to combat misinformation while increasing vaccine uptake in their communities. Results: Thematic analysis of the interviews identified three major challenges faced by public health officials in promoting vaccination: dissemination of misinformation in media, political polarization of COVID and its contribution to vaccine acceptance and COVID fatigue, and assessment of the risks associated with disease severity versus vaccine safety considering limited public health resources. Discussion: Learning from public health officials allows us to better understand their perceptions of the extent of local vaccine hesitancies and their advice on how to counteract fears and misinformation and to promote COVID vaccine uptake. Political polarization of COVID and misinformation affected community vaccine acceptance and challenged local public health leadership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.