Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179477›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Light blocking film in a glasshouse impacts

Chelsea R Maier, Sachin G Chavan, Norbert Klause, Weiguang Liang, Christopher I Cazzonelli, Oula Ghannoum, Zhong-Hua Chen, David T Tissue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chelsea R MaierNational Vegetable Protected Cropping Centre, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Sachin G ChavanHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Norbert KlauseNational Vegetable Protected Cropping Centre, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Weiguang LiangNational Vegetable Protected Cropping Centre, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Christopher I CazzonelliNational Vegetable Protected Cropping Centre, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Oula GhannoumNational Vegetable Protected Cropping Centre, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Zhong-Hua ChenNational Vegetable Protected Cropping Centre, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
David T TissueNational Vegetable Protected Cropping Centre, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Western Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High energy costs are a barrier to producing high-quality produce at protected cropping facilities. A potential solution to mitigate high energy costs is film technology, which blocks heat-producing radiation; however, the alteration of the light environment by these films may impact crop yield and quality. Previous studies have assessed the impact of ULR 80 [i.e., light-blocking film (LBF)] on crop yield and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR); however, an assessment of the spectral environment over different seasons is important to understand potential crop impacts through different developmental phases. In this study, two varieties (red and orange) of

Indexed as

agricultural technologyCapsicum annuum L.energy uselight blocking filmlight intensitylight qualityprotected croppingresource sustainability

Identifiers

PMID38179477
PMCPMC10766360
OpenAlexW4389952746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.