Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179464›Full record

ArticleBiomedicine hub

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Umbilical Venous Catheter Insertion with Blind Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purbasha Mishra, Pankaj Kumar Mohanty, Tapas Kumar Som, Tanushree Sahoo, Usha Devi, Nerbadyswari Deep Bag

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Real-time ultrasound to assess the umbilical catheter position in neonates: a randomized, controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Purbasha MishraDepartment of Neonatology, DM Neonatology, NICU Department, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
Pankaj Kumar MohantyDepartment of Neonatology, DNB Neonatology, NICU Department, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
Tapas Kumar SomDepartment of Neonatology, DM Neonatology, NICU Department, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
Tanushree SahooDepartment of Neonatology, DM Neonatology, NICU Department, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
Usha DeviDepartment of Neonatology, DM Neonatology, NICU Department, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
Nerbadyswari Deep BagDepartment of Radiology, MD Radiology, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasonography (USG) can be used in neonates to manipulate and place the umbilical catheter in the correct position. Although chest radiograph (CXR) is the gold standard, a noninvasive method like USG without radiation exposure may be an alternative bedside armamentarium to the clinician. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether USG-guided umbilical venous catheter (UVC) insertion is superior to the conventional method for the successful insertion of UVC. Method: The neonates born between 25 and 42 weeks of gestation requiring parenteral fluids and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between September 2020 and November 2022 were randomized in two weight-based strata: ≤1,200 and >1,200 g. USG-guided UVC insertion was done in the intervention group and blind UVC insertion was done in the control group. Results: Out of 112 enrolled neonates, 58 were in the USG-guided group and 54 in the blind group. There was no significant difference in the failure rate between the intervention and control groups (20% versus 29% [RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.36-1.33]). The sensitivity and specificity of USG in locating tip position were 97 and 46.8%, respectively. The mean procedure time in USG and blind groups was 8.9 and 8.3 min, respectively ( Conclusion: USG does not reduce the failure rates during the insertion of umbilical catheters. However, being a safe, noninvasive procedure, it can be considered a rescue modality to CXR in NICUs equipped with portable USG for guiding UVC insertion.

Indexed as

NeonatesUltrasoundUltrasound-guided insertionUmbilical venous catheter

Identifiers

PMID38179464
PMCPMC10764083
OpenAlexW4390532519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.