Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179461›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

The efficacy and safety of ketamine for depression in patients with cancer: A systematic review.

Leila Azari, Homa Hemati, Ronia Tavasolian, Sareh Shahdab, Stephanie M Tomlinson, Margarita Bobonis Babilonia, Jeffrey Huang, Danielle B Tometich, Kea Turner, Heather S L Jim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Ketamine or Esketamine in Special Populations of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Leila AzariUniversity of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States.
Homa HematiCollege of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ronia TavasolianDepartment of Clinical Science and Nutrition, University of Chester, England.
Sareh ShahdabCollege of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Stephanie M TomlinsonUniversity of South Florida Health Libraries Morsani University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States.
Margarita Bobonis BabiloniaSupportive Care Medicine Department, Behavioral Medicine Services, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.
Jeffrey HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.
Danielle B TometichDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.
Kea TurnerDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.
Heather S L JimDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.
Amir Alishahi TabrizDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States.
University of South Florida · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Chester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Management of depression in the oncology population includes supportive psychotherapeutic interventions with or without psychotropic medication, which take time to demonstrate effectiveness. Fast-acting interventions, like ketamine, can provide a rapid antidepressant effect; however, there has been limited research on effects of ketamine among cancer patients. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of research on the efficacy and safety of ketamine on depression in patients with cancer. Methods: We reviewed the published literature in MEDLINE® (via PubMed®), EMBASE, and Scopus from 1 January 1982 to 20 October 2022. We screened the retrieved abstracts against inclusion criteria and conducted a full-text review of eligible studies. Following extraction of data from included studies, we used a framework analysis approach to summarize the evidence on using ketamine in patients with cancer. Results: All 5 included studies were randomized clinical trials conducted in inpatient settings in China. In all included studies ketamine was administered intravenously. Three studies used only racemic ketamine, and two studies used both S-ketamine and racemic ketamine. All included studies reported ketamine a tolerable and effective drug to control depression symptoms. Conclusion: Included studies showed administration of sub-anesthesia ketamine significantly improves postoperative depression among patients with cancer.

Indexed as

AntidepressantCancerDepressionKetamineSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38179461
PMCPMC10764987
OpenAlexW4389774662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.