ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024
Distal periarterial sympathectomy surgery for chronic digital ischemia: A systematic review of the literature.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distal brachial-radial artery bypass with periarterial sympathectomy in Buerger disease: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- A Case of Critical Digit Ischemia in a Patient With Suspected Seronegative Scleroderma Diagnosed via Nailfold Capillaroscopy.Case reports in rheumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study assesses the efficacy of distal periarterial sympathectomy in treating chronic digital ischemia by evaluating clinical outcomes of surgery. Methods: A systematic literature review of distal sympathectomy for chronic digital ischemia was conducted. Data extracted included study design, patient statistics, aetiology, follow-up duration, sympathectomy level, and surgical outcomes. Results: 21 studies were analysed, containing a total of 337 patients, 324 hands, and 398 digits. Patient age ranged from 23.2 to 56.6 years. Causes of ischemia included Scleroderma, Raynaud's disease, atherosclerosis/Buerger's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus/discoid lupus, undifferentiated rheumatic disorder/mixed connective tissue disease, CREST syndrome, trauma and unknown diagnoses. Common digital artery sympathectomy was mostly performed. Follow-up spanned 12-120 months. Outcomes: Distal sympathectomy led to reduced pain in 94.7 % patients. Complete resolution of ulceration was seen in 73 % patients. Subsequent amputation was required in 28 % patients. Other complications were reported in 24.1 % patients. Conclusions: This study indicates that distal periarterial sympathectomy may effectively treat chronic digital ischemia, offering pain relief and resolution of digital ulceration. However, risks of complications and amputation persist. Further research is required to inform patient selection and establish the optimal technique and extent of distal sympathectomy surgery, before it can be considered a valid treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.