ArticleCureus2023
A 22-Year Study to Assess Disparities in Place of Death Among Patients With Diabetes.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Demographic profiles and disparities in all liver diseases and diabetes mellitus patients - related mortality among older adults (≥ 65) in the United States, 1999 to 2020.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Where Do Patients With Cirrhosis Die? A CDC WONDER Analysis From 1999 to 2020.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Rising Mortality Related to Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension: Trends and Disparities in the United States (1999-2023).Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- Demographic trends and disparities in mortality related to coexisting heart failure and diabetes mellitus among older adults in the United States between 1999 and 2020: A retrospective population-based cohort study from the CDC WONDER database.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024Article
- Unveiling End-of-Life Disparities in Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease: A 22-Year Analysis of the CDC-WONDER Database.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This study examines disparities in the place of death in patients in the United States with diabetes mellitus (DM) using data from the CDC WONDER (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database covering a 22-year period (1999-2020). Looking at age, gender, ethnicity, and census location, among other variables, the study aims to understand trends and determinants of mortality at home or hospice care compared to mortality at a medical or nursing facilities. Materials and methods An online freely accessible mortality database, CDC WONDER database, was used to collect information regarding DM-related mortality, using the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11) code range E10-E14. To investigate patterns in location of death, the research population was split by census regions, racial categories, age groups, and gender. Statistical techniques such as univariate logistic regression and graphical representations were employed. Results Based on a study of 1,674,724 DM-related deaths, medical or nursing facilities recorded higher deaths (1,041,602) compared to home or hospice deaths (572,567). The highest number of deaths in home or hospice setting was recorded for the age group of 75-84 years (146,820), male gender (324,325), Census Region 3 (South) (225,636), and white race (458,690). Among the patients with death at home or a hospice center; the odds were highest for the age group of 55-64 years, male gender, Census Region 4 (West), and American Indian or Alaska Native race. Discussion The results showed a general upward trend in DM patients' deaths at home and in hospice care in the United States. Males, white people, and those in the age group of 75-84 years notably had the highest death rates. Regional differences also came into play, with the South showing the biggest trend in mortality. To better understand the underlying causes of these changes and to increase at-risk groups' access to healthcare facilities, more research is required. Conclusion There is an overall rising trend in home and hospice deaths in the United States for patients with DM, but with a steady dip between the years 2005 and 2010. Patient deaths from DM were categorized by age groups, gender, race, and census regions. The highest mortality trends are exhibited in whites, males, and those aged 75-84 years. Out of the census regions, the South has the highest mortality trend. Further studies could be carried out to determine the reasons for the rising trends in home or hospice deaths in the aforementioned groups and how to provide these groups with better access to healthcare facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.