ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Machine learning-based clinical decision support for infection risk prediction.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- [A Transformer-based multimodal model for predicting hospital-acquired infections using imaging and clinical laboratory data].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Intuitive Risk Equation for Post-Transplant Bloodstream Infection Prediction: A Symbolic Regression Approach.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Performance of predictive AI-based clinical decision support systems across clinical domains: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- An interpretable deep learning framework for predictive modeling of postoperative infections in ICU patients.PloS one · 2026Article
- An infection prediction model developed from inpatient data can predict out-of-hospital COVID-19 infections from wearable data when controlled for dataset shift.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Implementing Symptom-Based Predictive Models for Early Diagnosis of Pediatric Respiratory Viral Infections.Viruses · 2025Article
- Article
- The application of machine learning in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- A research agenda for burn infection prevention: identifying knowledge gaps and prioritizing future directions.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Detection of Untreated Infection.Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Development and evaluation of a model for predicting the risk of healthcare-associated infections in patients admitted to intensive care units.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Real-time infection prediction with wearable physiological monitoring and AI to aid military workforce readiness during COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare-associated infection (HAI) remains a significant risk for hospitalized patients and a challenging burden for the healthcare system. This study presents a clinical decision support tool that can be used in clinical workflows to proactively engage secondary assessments of pre-symptomatic and at-risk infection patients, thereby enabling earlier diagnosis and treatment. Methods: This study applies machine learning, specifically ensemble-based boosted decision trees, on large retrospective hospital datasets to develop an infection risk score that predicts infection before obvious symptoms present. We extracted a stratified machine learning dataset of 36,782 healthcare-associated infection patients. The model leveraged vital signs, laboratory measurements and demographics to predict HAI before clinical suspicion, defined as the order of a microbiology test or administration of antibiotics. Results: Our best performing infection risk model achieves a cross-validated AUC of 0.88 at 1 h before clinical suspicion and maintains an AUC >0.85 for 48 h before suspicion by aggregating information across demographics and a set of 163 vital signs and laboratory measurements. A second model trained on a reduced feature space comprising demographics and the 36 most frequently measured vital signs and laboratory measurements can still achieve an AUC of 0.86 at 1 h before clinical suspicion. These results compare favorably against using temperature alone and clinical rules such as the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score. Along with the performance results, we also provide an analysis of model interpretability via feature importance rankings. Conclusion: The predictive model aggregates information from multiple physiological parameters such as vital signs and laboratory measurements to provide a continuous risk score of infection that can be deployed in hospitals to provide advance warning of patient deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.