Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Evaluation of an OSCE's implementation and a two-step approach for a theoretical and practical training program in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ruben Plöger, Alina Abramian, Eva Katharina Egger, Alexander Mustea, Nicole Sänger, Hannah Plöger, Eva Weber, Ulrich Gembruch, Adeline Walter, Brigitte Strizek and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ruben PlögerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alina AbramianDepartment of Senology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Eva Katharina EggerDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander MusteaDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nicole SängerDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hannah PlögerDepartment of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Eva WeberDivision of Prenatal Medicine, Gynecological Ultrasound and Fetal Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ulrich GembruchDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Adeline WalterDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Brigitte StrizekDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Florian ReckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a well-known assessment method to evaluate clinical skills and competence in healthcare. Following the recently reformed National Competence-Based Catalog of Learning Objectives in Medicine, the implementation of this assessment method in the training program for medical students is now obligatory in Germany. This major change requires a reorganization not only of the training programs but also of the students themselves and the way they learn. We performed a poll evaluating the students' opinions regarding these major changes and the implementation of the OSCE with a new training program. To implement this assessment method and to evaluate the OSCE, Kern's six-step approach comprising (1) problem identification and general needs assessment, (2) needs assessment of the targeted learners, (3) goals and objectives, (4) educational strategies, (5) implementation, and (6) evaluation and feedback was applied. To evaluate and gather feedback, a poll was used to analyze the student's opinions regarding OSCE in gynecology and obstetrics and OSCE in general, in addition to the regular analysis of the students' results. To reform the educational strategy, a two-step approach was developed: First, the students completed the regular training program and a written examination, and second, they participated in a 1-week clerkship, in small group teaching, and in the OSCE. The OSCE stations were developed primarily based on the National Competence-Based Catalog and the German Catalog of Learning Objectives in Medicine, as well as on the feedback of experts reflecting their expectations for physicians beginning their careers. The students performed well in the OSCE and gave positive feedback regarding this examination method. Furthermore, they welcomed the upcoming changes by considering OSCE a valuable assessment tool, and they showed appreciation for the two-step approach by supporting the combination of an OSCE and a written examination. Thus, this article presents the implementation of an OSCE and a strategy for the adaptation of the curriculum to fulfill the new OSCE requirements and-to our knowledge-reveals students' primary opinions regarding the changes in their medical training program for the first time.

Indexed as

gynecology and obstetricsimplementationinterprofessional trainingnational curriculum reformOSCEtransitionundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID38179276
PMCPMC10765409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.