Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179255›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Prediction of patient admission and readmission in adults from a Colombian cohort with bipolar disorder using artificial intelligence.

María Alejandra Palacios-Ariza, Esteban Morales-Mendoza, Jossie Murcia, Rafael Arias-Duarte, Germán Lara-Castellanos, Andrés Cely-Jiménez, Juan Carlos Rincón-Acuña, Marcos J Araúzo-Bravo, Jorge McDouall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predicting Psychiatric Readmission of Children and Adolescents Using Machine Learning.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

María Alejandra Palacios-ArizaUnidad de Investigación, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Psicopatología y Sociedad Research Group, Bogotá, Colombia.
Esteban Morales-Mendoza *Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Gerencia y Gestión Sanitaria Research Group, Instituto de Gerencia y Gestión Sanitaria (IGGS), Bogotá, Colombia.
Jossie Murcia *Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Gerencia y Gestión Sanitaria Research Group, Instituto de Gerencia y Gestión Sanitaria (IGGS), Bogotá, Colombia.
Rafael Arias-Duarte *Psicopatología y Sociedad Research Group, Facultad de Medicina, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia.
Germán Lara-Castellanos *Psicopatología y Sociedad Research Group, Facultad de Medicina, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrés Cely-Jiménez *Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan Carlos Rincón-Acuña *Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia.
Marcos J Araúzo-Bravo *Keralty, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jorge McDouall *Sanitas Crea Research Group, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia.
Fundación Universitaria Sanitas · COBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESUniversidad De Santander · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronically progressive mental condition, associated with a reduced quality of life and greater disability. Patient admissions are preventable events with a considerable impact on global functioning and social adjustment. While machine learning (ML) approaches have proven prediction ability in other diseases, little is known about their utility to predict patient admissions in this pathology. Aim: To develop prediction models for hospital admission/readmission within 5 years of diagnosis in patients with BD using ML techniques. Methods: The study utilized data from patients diagnosed with BD in a major healthcare organization in Colombia. Candidate predictors were selected from Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and included sociodemographic and clinical variables. ML algorithms, including Decision Trees, Random Forests, Logistic Regressions, and Support Vector Machines, were used to predict patient admission or readmission. Survival models, including a penalized Cox Model and Random Survival Forest, were used to predict time to admission and first readmission. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and concordance index. Results: The admission dataset included 2,726 BD patients, with 354 admissions, while the readmission dataset included 352 patients, with almost half being readmitted. The best-performing model for predicting admission was the Random Forest, with an accuracy score of 0.951 and an AUC of 0.98. The variables with the greatest predictive power in the Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) importance analysis were the number of psychiatric emergency visits, the number of outpatient follow-up appointments and age. Survival models showed similar results, with the Random Survival Forest performing best, achieving an AUC of 0.95. However, the prediction models for patient readmission had poorer performance, with the Random Forest model being again the best performer but with an AUC below 0.70. Conclusion: ML models, particularly the Random Forest model, outperformed traditional statistical techniques for admission prediction. However, readmission prediction models had poorer performance. This study demonstrates the potential of ML techniques in improving prediction accuracy for BD patient admissions.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderelectronic health recordsmachine learningpatient admissionpatient readmissionrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38179255
PMCPMC10764573
OpenAlexW4390056199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.