Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179199›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2023

This is no "ICA bug": response to the article, "ICA's bug: how ghost ICs emerge from effective rank deficiency caused by EEG electrode interpolation and incorrect re-referencing".

Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mobility Function and Aperiodic Electrocortical Activity in Younger and Older Adults.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hyper-extralemniscal model of Fragile X syndrome.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arnaud DelormeSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Scott MakeigSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

EEGLAB: Software for Analysis of Human Brain DynamicsR01NS047293 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig · 2004 to 2026
$10.2M
BRAIN INITIATIVE RESOURCE: DEVELOPMENT OF A HUMAN NEUROELECTROMAGNETIC DATA ARCHIVE AND TOOLS RESOURCE (NEMAR)R24MH120037 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Arnaud Delorme, Amitava Majumdar · 2019 to 2026
$5.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH120037NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

EEGghostICArankreference

Identifiers

PMID38179199
PMCPMC10764542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.