Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179077›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Blacklegged ticks,

Claire E Gooding, Charlotte Pinard, Regine Gries, Anand Devireddy, Gerhard Gries

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Blacklegged ticks,Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire E GoodingDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6.ORCID 0000-0003-1224-4216
Charlotte PinardDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6.
Regine GriesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6.
Anand DevireddyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6.
Gerhard GriesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6.ORCID 0000-0003-3115-8989
Simon Fraser University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks spend most of their life inhabiting leaf litter and detritus where they are protected from sun but preyed upon by ants. Ants secrete chemical communication signals to coordinate group tasks such as nest defence. Ticks that avoid ant semiochemicals-as indicators of ant presence-would reduce predation risk by ants. We tested the hypotheses that: (i) chemical deposits from the thatching ant

Indexed as

formic acidhydrocarbonspredator avoidancerepellentsemiochemicals

Identifiers

PMID38179077
PMCPMC10762436
OpenAlexW4390539998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.