Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179057›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Evaluation of the humoral and mucosal immune response of a multiepitope vaccine against COVID-19 in pigs.

Juan Mosqueda, Diego Josimar Hernández-Silva, Marco Antonio Vega-López, Lineth J Vega-Rojas, Rolando Beltrán, Andrés Velasco-Elizondo, María Del Carmen Ramírez-Estudillo, Mario Fragoso-Saavedra, Chyntia Pérez-Almeida, Jesús Hernández and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Juan MosquedaImmunology and Vaccines Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Diego Josimar Hernández-SilvaImmunology and Vaccines Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Marco Antonio Vega-LópezCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados (CINVESTAV) del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Departamento de Infectómica y Patogénesis Molecular, Laboratorio de Inmunobiología de las Mucosas, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Lineth J Vega-RojasImmunology and Vaccines Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Rolando BeltránFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Andrés Velasco-ElizondoImmunology and Vaccines Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
María Del Carmen Ramírez-EstudilloCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados (CINVESTAV) del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Departamento de Infectómica y Patogénesis Molecular, Laboratorio de Inmunobiología de las Mucosas, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Mario Fragoso-SaavedraCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados (CINVESTAV) del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Departamento de Infectómica y Patogénesis Molecular, Laboratorio de Inmunobiología de las Mucosas, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Chyntia Pérez-AlmeidaImmunology and Vaccines Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Jesús HernándezLaboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Edgar A Melgoza-GonzálezLaboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Diana Hinojosa-TrujilloLaboratorio de Inmunología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Miguel Ángel Mercado-UriosteguiImmunology and Vaccines Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Alma Susana Mejía-LópezImmunology and Vaccines Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Carlos Rivera-BallesterosImmunology and Vaccines Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Teresa García-GascaFacultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Autonomous University of Queretaro · MXCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated the immune response to a multiepitope recombinant chimeric protein (CHIVAX) containing B- and T-cell epitopes of the SARS-CoV-2 spike's receptor binding domain (RBD) in a translational porcine model for pre-clinical studies. Methods: We generated a multiepitope recombinant protein engineered to include six coding conserved epitopes from the RBD domain of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein. Pigs were divided into groups and immunized with different doses of the protein, with serum samples collected over time to determine antibody responses by indirect ELISA and antibody titration. Peptide recognition was also analyzed by Western blotting. A surrogate neutralization assay with recombinant ACE2 and RBDs was performed. Intranasal doses of the immunogen were also prepared and tested on Vietnamese minipigs. Results: When the immunogen was administered subcutaneously, it induced specific IgG antibodies in pigs, and higher doses correlated with higher antibody levels. Antibodies from immunized pigs recognized individual peptides in the multiepitope vaccine and inhibited RBD-ACE2 binding for five variants of concern (VOC). Comparative antigen delivery methods showed that both, subcutaneous and combined subcutaneous/intranasal approaches, induced specific IgG and IgA antibodies, with the subcutaneous approach having superior neutralizing activity. CHIVAX elicited systemic immunity, evidenced by specific IgG antibodies in the serum, and local mucosal immunity, indicated by IgA antibodies in saliva, nasal, and bronchoalveolar lavage secretions. Importantly, these antibodies demonstrated neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 Discussion: The elicited antibodies recognized individual epitopes on the chimeric protein and demonstrated the capacity to block RBD-ACE2 binding of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and four VOCs. The findings provide proof of concept for using multiepitope recombinant antigens and a combined immunization protocol to induce a neutralizing immune response against SARS-CoV-2 in the pig translational model for preclinical studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsCOVID-19 VaccinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansImmunity, MucosalImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusSwineSwine, MiniatureAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2COVID-19 VaccinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2VaccinesCOVID-19humoral responsemucosal immunitymultiepitopic vaccinerecombinant proteinSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38179057
PMCPMC10765521
OpenAlexW4390011953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.