Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179056›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Spatial modelling of the tumor microenvironment from multiplex immunofluorescence images: methods and applications.

Gayatri Kumar, Renganayaki Krishna Pandurengan, Edwin Roger Parra, Kasthuri Kannan, Cara Haymaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gayatri KumarDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Renganayaki Krishna PandurenganDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Edwin Roger ParraDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Kasthuri KannanDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Cara HaymakerDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Translational Cancer Immune Monitoring and Analysis Center (TCIMAC)U24CA224285 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Gheath Al-Atrash, Cara L Haymaker · 2017 to 2026
$16.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U24 CA224285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial modelling methods have gained prominence with developments in high throughput imaging platforms. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) provides the scope to examine interactions between tumor and immune compartment at single cell resolution using a panel of antibodies that can be chosen based on the cancer type or the clinical interest of the study. The markers can be used to identify the phenotypes and to examine cellular interactions at global and local scales. Several translational studies rely on key understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) to identify drivers of immune response in immunotherapy based clinical trials. To improve the success of ongoing trials, a number of retrospective approaches can be adopted to understand differences in response, recurrence and progression by examining the patient's TME from tissue samples obtained at baseline and at various time points along the treatment. The multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) technique provides insight on patient specific cell populations and their relative spatial distribution as qualitative measures of a favorable treatment outcome. Spatial analysis of these images provides an understanding of the intratumoral heterogeneity and clustering among cell populations in the TME. A number of mathematical models, which establish clustering as a measure of deviation from complete spatial randomness, can be applied to the mIF images represented as spatial point patterns. These mathematical models, developed for landscape ecology and geographic information studies, can be applied to the TME after careful consideration of the tumor type (cold vs. hot) and the tumor immune landscape. The spatial modelling of mIF images can show observable engagement of T cells expressing immune checkpoint molecules and this can then be correlated with single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAntibodiesCell CommunicationHumansRetrospective StudiesAntibodiescomplete spatial randomnessmultiplexed imaging and cellular neighborhoodmultiplex immunofluorescencespatial clusteringtumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38179056
PMCPMC10765501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.