Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38179018›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2024

Prostatic urethral lift for subjects in urinary retention (PULSAR): 12-Month results of a prospective controlled trial compared with real-world outcomes.

Mark Rochester, Ruth Doherty, Toby Page, Neil Barber, Rajesh Kavia, Nikesh Thiruchelvam, Steven Gange, Thomas Mueller, Gregg Eure, Peter Chin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Initial outcomes and surgical techniques of prostatic urethral lift for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Japan.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark RochesterNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital Norwich UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3143-6694
Ruth DohertyNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital Norwich UK.
Toby PageFreeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne UK.
Neil BarberFrimley Park Hospital Frimley UK.
Rajesh KaviaNorthwick Park Hospital Harrow UK.
Nikesh ThiruchelvamCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2910-2209
Steven GangeSummit Urology Group Murray Utah USA.
Thomas MuellerDelaware Valley Urology Voorhees New Jersey USA.
Gregg EureUrology of Virginia Virginia Beach Virginia USA.
Peter ChinSouth Coast Urology Wollongong New South Wales Australia.
Oliver KayesLeeds Teaching Hospitals and University of Leeds Leeds UK.
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBFreeman Hospital · GBFrimley Park Hospital · GBNew Jersey Urology · USNorthwick Park Hospital · GBOrthopedic Specialty Hospital · USUniversity of Leeds · GBUrology of Virginia · USWollongong Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of prostatic urethral lift (PUL) in acute urinary retention (AUR) patients within a controlled (PULSAR) and real-world setting (Real-World Retrospective study). Materials and methods: PULSAR was a 12-month prospective study of PUL in AUR patients ( Results: Seventy-three percent of PULSAR subjects were catheter independent and free from surgical reintervention at 12 months post-PUL. Success was associated with higher voiding efficiency during the perioperative period. Slightly higher catheter-independent rates (80%) were seen in RWRr patients; variables that influenced success included age <70 years, lower baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA), lower baseline post-void residual (PVR) and shorter pre-procedural catheter duration. Logistic regression of the combined PULSAR and RWRr retention groups revealed that procedural age <70 years and higher bladder voiding efficiency (BVE) were associated with success. Conclusions: Lower baseline PSA and PVR, younger age and shorter pre-procedure catheter durations drove successful outcomes in AUR patients undergoing PUL. Post-PUL voiding efficiencies may help ascertain long-term response to treatment.

Indexed as

acute urinary retentionbenign prostatic hypertrophybladder outflow obstructionbladder voiding efficiencyprostatic urethral lift

Identifiers

PMID38179018
PMCPMC10764167
OpenAlexW4386573379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.