Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178899›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2024

First Trimester Contingent Screening for Aneuploidies with Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Singleton Pregnancies - a Swiss Single Centre Experience.

Alice Proto, Fabienne Trottmann, Sophie Schneider, Sofia Amylidi-Mohr, Florent Badiqué, Lorenz Risch, Daniel Surbek, Luigi Raio, Beatrice Mosimann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alice ProtoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1515-9079
Fabienne TrottmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Sophie SchneiderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Sofia Amylidi-MohrDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5996-4064
Florent BadiquéDivisions of Clinical Chemistry & Medical Genetics, Dr Risch AG, Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Lorenz RischDivisions of Clinical Chemistry & Medical Genetics, Dr Risch AG, Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Daniel SurbekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Luigi RaioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Beatrice MosimannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Switzerland was amongst the first countries to offer cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing covered by the health insurance to pregnant women with a risk ≥ 1:1000 for trisomies at first trimester combined screening (FTCS). The aim of this study is to evaluate the implementation of this contingent model in a single tertiary referral centre and its effect on gestational age at diagnosing trisomy 21. Materials and Methods: Between July 2015 and December 2020 all singleton pregnancies at 11-14 weeks of gestation without major fetal malformation were included and stratified according to their risk at FTCS. Statistical analysis was performed by GraphPad Version 9.1 for Windows. Results: 4424 pregnancies were included. Of 166 (3.8%) pregnancies with a NT ≥ 3.5 mm and/or a risk ≥ 1:10 at FCTS, 130 (78.3%) opted for direct invasive testing. 803 (18.2%) pregnancies had an intermediate risk, 692 (86.2%) of them opted for cffDNA first. 3455 (78.1%) pregnancies had a risk < 1:1000. 63 fetuses were diagnosed with trisomy 21, 47 (74.6%) directly by invasive procedures after FTCS, 16 (25.4%) by cffDNA first. Conclusions: Most women choose cffDNA or invasive testing as second tier according to national guidelines. Despite the delay associated with cffDNA testing after FCTS, 75% of all trisomy 21 are still diagnosed in the first trimester with this contingent screening model.

Indexed as

cell-free fetal DNAfirst trimester screeningnon-invasive prenatal testingtrisomies

Identifiers

PMID38178899
PMCPMC10764121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.