Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178885›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Comparison of state-of-the-art deep learning architectures for detection of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease.

Emilie Charlotte Klaver, Irene B Heijink, Gianluigi Silvestri, Jeroen P P van Vugt, Sabine Janssen, Jorik Nonnekes, Richard J A van Wezel, Marleen C Tjepkema-Cloostermans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie Charlotte KlaverDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Irene B HeijinkDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Gianluigi SilvestriDepartment of Neurobiology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jeroen P P van VugtDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Sabine JanssenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jorik NonnekesDepartment of Rehabilitation, Centre of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Richard J A van WezelDepartment of Neurobiology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Marleen C Tjepkema-CloostermansDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Medisch Spectrum Twente · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLImec the Netherlands · NLSint Maartenskliniek · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Freezing of gait (FOG) is one of the most debilitating motor symptoms experienced by patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). FOG detection is possible using acceleration data from wearable sensors, and a convolutional neural network (CNN) is often used to determine the presence of FOG epochs. We compared the performance of a standard CNN for the detection of FOG with two more complex networks, which are well suited for time series data, the MiniRocket and the InceptionTime. Methods: We combined acceleration data of people with PD across four studies. The final data set was split into a training (80%) and hold-out test (20%) set. A fifth study was included as an unseen test set. The data were windowed (2 s) and five-fold cross-validation was applied. The CNN, MiniRocket, and InceptionTime models were evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and its area under the curve (AUC). Multiple sensor configurations were evaluated for the best model. The geometric mean was subsequently calculated to select the optimal threshold. The selected model and threshold were evaluated on the hold-out and unseen test set. Results: A total of 70 participants (23.7 h, 9% FOG) were included in this study for training and testing, and in addition, 10 participants provided an unseen test set (2.4 h, 11% FOG). The CNN performed best (AUC = 0.86) in comparison to the InceptionTime (AUC = 0.82) and MiniRocket (AUC = 0.76) models. For the CNN, we found a similar performance for a seven-sensor configuration (lumbar, upper and lower legs and feet; AUC = 0.86), six-sensor configuration (upper and lower legs and feet; AUC = 0.87), and two-sensor configuration (lower legs; AUC = 0.86). The optimal threshold of 0.45 resulted in a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 58% for the hold-out set (AUC = 0.72), and a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 68% for the unseen test set (AUC = 0.90). Conclusion: We confirmed that deep learning can be used to detect FOG in a large, heterogeneous dataset. The CNN model outperformed more complex networks. This model could be employed in future personalized interventions, with the ultimate goal of using automated FOG detection to trigger real-time cues to alleviate FOG in daily life.

Indexed as

accelerometerconvolutional neural networkdeep learningfreezing of gaitInceptionTimeMiniRocketParkinson’s diseasewearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID38178885
PMCPMC10764416
OpenAlexW4390055973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.