Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178784›Full record

ArticlemAbs

Antibodies to watch in 2024.

Silvia Crescioli, Hélène Kaplon, Alicia Chenoweth, Lin Wang, Jyothsna Visweswaraiah, Janice M Reichert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Silvia CrescioliBusiness Intelligence Research, The Antibody Society, Inc., Framingham, MA, US.ORCID 0000-0002-1909-5957
Hélène KaplonTranslational Medicine Department, Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-2195
Alicia ChenowethSt. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2736-9268
Lin WangRegeneron, Formulation Development, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY, US.ORCID 0009-0005-7958-9894
Jyothsna VisweswaraiahDrug Creation, Seismic Therapeutic, Cambridge, MA, US.ORCID 0000-0002-6181-2438
Janice M ReichertBusiness Intelligence Research, The Antibody Society, Inc., Framingham, MA, US.ORCID 0000-0003-0400-1951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'Antibodies to Watch' article series provides an annual summary of commercially sponsored monoclonal antibody therapeutics currently in late-stage clinical development, regulatory review, and those recently granted a first approval in any country. In this installment, we discuss key details for 16 antibody therapeutics granted a first approval in 2023, as of November 17 (lecanemab (Leqembi), rozanolixizumab (RYSTIGGO), pozelimab (VEOPOZ), mirikizumab (Omvoh), talquetamab (Talvey), elranatamab (Elrexfio), epcoritamab (EPKINLY), glofitamab (COLUMVI), retifanlimab (Zynyz), concizumab (Alhemo), lebrikizumab (EBGLYSS), tafolecimab (SINTBILO), narlumosbart (Jinlitai), zuberitamab (Enrexib), adebrelimab (Arelili), and divozilimab (Ivlizi)). We briefly review 26 product candidates for which marketing applications are under consideration in at least one country or region, and 23 investigational antibody therapeutics that are forecast to enter regulatory review by the end of 2024 based on company disclosures. These nearly 50 product candidates include numerous innovative bispecific antibodies, such as odronextamab, ivonescimab, linvoseltamab, zenocutuzumab, and erfonrilimab, and antibody-drug conjugates, such as trastuzumab botidotin, patritumab deruxtecan, datopotamab deruxtecan, and MRG002, as well as a mixture of two immunocytokines (bifikafusp alfa and onfekafusp alfa). We also discuss clinical phase transition and overall approval success rates for antibody therapeutics, which are crucial to the biopharmaceutical industry because these rates inform decisions about resource allocation. Our analyses indicate that these molecules have approval success rates in the range of 14-32%, with higher rates associated with antibodies developed for non-cancer indications. Overall, our data suggest that antibody therapeutic development efforts by the biopharmaceutical industry are robust and increasingly successful.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsImmunoconjugatesTrastuzumabAntineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsImmunoconjugatesTrastuzumabAntibody therapeuticscancerCOVID-19European Medicines AgencyFood and Drug Administrationimmune-mediated disordersSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38178784
PMCPMC10773713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.