Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178559›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Evaluation of Reliability of the Luna EMG Rehabilitation Robot to Assess Proprioception in the Upper Limbs in 102 Healthy Young Adults.

Justyna Leszczak, Andżelina Wolan-Nieroda, Mariusz Drużbicki, Anna Poświata, Michał Mikulski, Anna Roksela, Agnieszka Guzik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justyna LeszczakInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8769-0048
Andżelina Wolan-NierodaInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0188-4755
Mariusz DrużbickiInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4511-8419
Anna PoświataEGZOTech, Sp. z o.o., Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8989-3903
Michał MikulskiEGZOTech, Sp. z o.o., Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0599-7738
Anna RokselaFaculty of Automatic Control, Electronics, and Computer Science, PhD School, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-4586
Agnieszka GuzikUniversity of Rzeszów, University of Rzeszów, Medical Faculty, Institute of Health Sciences, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4582-4383
Rzeszów University · PLSilesian University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Proprioception, the body's ability to perceive its own position and movement, is fundamental for motor control and coordination. Reliable assessment tools are essential, particularly for conditions affecting proprioceptive function. This study aimed to evaluate the external and internal compliance of the Luna EMG -multifunction robotic device in assessing proprioception. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study involved 102 healthy students (31 men and 71 women; mean age 22.2±1.46 years), assessing proprioception using the Luna EMG for the upper limbs. Two investigators conducted measurements, which were repeated after 2 weeks under identical conditions. RESULTS Based on the identified values of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (ICC=0.969-0.997), which is a key measure of agreement between 2 assessments, the study shows a high agreement of measurements both between investigators (for right hand: P=0.3484 [Exam 1]; P=1.0000 [Exam 2]; for left hand: P=0.1092 [Exam 1]; P=0.7706 [Exam 2]) and between the examinations (for right hand: 0.1127 [Investigator 1]; 0.2113 [Investigator 2]; for left hand: P=0.0087 [Investigator 1]; P=0.1466 [Investigator 2]). The Bland-Altman analysis showed very small inter-rater deviations, approximately 0.05° in the first examination for the left side and 0.04° for the right side. The highest deviation between the examinations, amounting to 0.08°, was identified for the left side. CONCLUSIONS The study shows that the Luna EMG multifunction robotic device enables a reliable evaluation of upper limb proprioception. Measurements performed using this device show high internal and external consistency in the assessment of the proprioceptive senses of the upper limb in 102 healthy young adults.

Indexed as

RoboticsAdultFemaleHandHumansMaleProprioceptionReproducibility of ResultsUpper ExtremityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38178559
PMCPMC10775584
OpenAlexW4388900844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.