ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2024
Contribution of genetic variants to congenital heart defects in both singleton and twin fetuses: a Chinese cohort study.
Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole Genome Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnostics: The Danish Approach to Guideline Formation and Implementation Within Public Healthcare.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Application of Prenatal Whole Exome Sequencing for Congenital Heart Anomalies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Decoding structural birth defects through genomic landscapes: Innovative frameworks for diagnosis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Genetic impact of copy number variations on congenital heart defects: Current insights and future directions.Global medical genetics · 2025Review
- Complementary role of echocardiography, karyotyping, and chromosomal microarray in congenital cardiac anomalies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The pleiotropic spectrum of proximal 16p11.2 CNVs.American journal of human genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe contribution of genetic variants to congenital heart defects (CHDs) has been investigated in many postnatal cohorts but described in few prenatal fetus cohorts. Overall, specific genetic variants especially copy number variants (CNVs) leading to CHDs are somewhat diverse among different prenatal cohort studies. In this study, a total of 1118 fetuses with confirmed CHDs were recruited from three units over a 5-year period, composing 961 of singleton pregnancies and 157 of twin pregnancies. We performed chromosomal microarray analysis on all cases to detect numerical chromosomal abnormalities (NCAs) and pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs (P/LP CNVs) and employed whole-exome sequencing for some cases without NCAs and P/LP CNVs to detect P/LP sequence variants (P/LP SVs).
resultsOverall, NCAs and P/LP CNVs were identified in 17.6% (197/1118) of cases, with NCA accounting for 9.1% (102/1118) and P/LP CNV for 8.5% (95/1118). Nonisolated CHDs showed a significantly higher frequency of NCA than isolated CHD (27.3% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the frequency of P/LP CNVs between isolated and nonisolated CHD (11.7% vs. 7.7%). A total of 109 P/LP CNVs were identified in 95 fetuses, consisting of 97 (89.0%) de novo, 6 (5.5%) parental inherited and 6 (5.5%) with unavailable parental information. The 16p11.2 proximal BP4-BP5 deletion was detected in 0.9% (10/1118) of all cases, second only to the most common 22q11.21 proximal A-D deletion (2.1%, 23/1118). Most of the 16p11.2 deletions (8/10) detected were de novo, and were enriched in CHD cases compared with a control cohort from a previous study. Additionally, SV was identified in 12.9% (8/62) of cases without NCA and P/LP CNV, most of which were de novo with autosomal dominant inheritance.
conclusionsOur cohort study provides a deep profile of the contribution of genetic variants to CHDs in both singleton and twin fetuses; NCA and P/LP CNV contribute to 9.1% and 8.5% of CHD in fetuses, respectively. We confirmed the 16p11.2 deletion as a CHD-associated hotspot CNV, second only to the 22q11.21 deletion in frequency. Most 16p11.2 deletions detected were de novo. Additionally, P/LP SV was identified in 12.9% (8/62) of fetuses without NCA or P/LP CNV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.