Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178217›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2024

Dietary preferences and quality of life among dialysis patients in Pune: a cross-sectional study.

Devaki Gokhale, Sehlaa Kaskar, Ariti Bansal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Devaki Gokhale *Symbiosis Institute of Health Science, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. devakijgokhale@gmail.com.
Sehlaa Kaskar *Symbiosis Institute of Health Science, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Ariti BansalSymbiosis Institute of Health Science, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the dietary preference and quality of life among dialysis patients in Pune.

methodThis cross-sectional study was conducted among 127 dialysis patients aged 18-70 through a one-on-one interview to record data on demographic, biochemical, diet preference, and quality of life. The anthropometric and biochemical parameters were recorded with the help of patient reports from the four dialysis centers. A kidney disease quality of life questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life.

resultThe mean age of the dialysis patients was (49.1 ± 12.9), comprising of males (104, 81.9%). (63, 49.6%) of the participants belonged to the normal weight category, followed by the underweight category. No association was noted between diet preference and quality of life, but a significant difference between BMI and personal appearance was observed. Serum calcium levels were highest (64.29 ± 1.0) in individuals in the high category of the effect of kidney disease compared to low serum calcium levels (20.89 ± 14.71) in the low category of the same.

conclusionThe present study found that diet preferences were affected due to diet restrictions, but their association with quality of life was not significantly proven. The mean for the disease burden was the lowest, implying poor quality of life among dialysis patients. Therefore, providing nutrition education and counseling for dialysis patients is crucial. A detailed dialysis care plan must address all patient requirements, including medication, dietary changes, modifications, and malnutrition screenings.

Indexed as

And hemodialysisDietary preferenceKidney DiseaseQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38178217
PMCPMC10768113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.