Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178168›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Comparison of the effects of esketamine, sufentanil, or lidocaine combined with propofol on tussis reflection during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: study protocol for a randomised, two centre, three-blind, controlled trial.

Hai-Jun Hou, Lu Liu, Ming Tian, Fu-Shan Xue

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05497492 (Comparison of the Effects of Esketamine, Sufentanil, or Lidocaine Combined With Propofol on Tussis Reflection During Upper Gastroscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05497492 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of the Effects of Esketamine, Sufentanil, or Lidocaine Combined With Propofol on Tussis Reflection During Upper Gastroscopy: a Randomised, Two Centre, Three-blind, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Friendship HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled400ConditionsAnesthesiaArmspropofol, propofol and sufentanil, propofol and esketamine, propofol and lidocaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hai-Jun HouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Lu LiuDepartment of Day Surgery Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Ming TianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. 13601167650@139.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0080-6827
Fu-Shan XueDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China. xuefushan@aliyun.com.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTussis, which increases the incidence of airway spasm, aspiration, nausea, and vomiting, is a common complication faced during upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. However, sedatives and analgesics exhibit inhibitory actions against airway reflexes to different degrees. Our assumption is a combination of propofol and small doses of sufentanil, esketamine, or lidocaine, especially the combination of propofol and esketamine, might reduce tussis incidence.

methodThe study will be performed as a randomised controlled three-blind, two-centre trial. Patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy, ≥ 18 years old, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-III will be randomised to four groups: P group (single administration of propofol), P + S group (administration of propofol and sufentanil in combination), P + K group (administration of propofol and esketamine in combination), and P + L group (administration of propofol and lidocaine in combination) (N = 100 per group). The primary endpoints include the frequency of tussis, nausea and vomiting, and/or body movements observed at the insertion of the endoscope into the pharyngeal cavity or within 5 min of endoscope insertion. Secondary outcomes are recovery assessment, patients' and endoscopists' satisfaction with the procedure, MMSE scores, MET scores, sleep condition, and the number of sedation-related events. Data on sedation-related events are collected by recording of vital signs. Satisfaction parameters and mental states are collected by means of questionnaires and evaluation scales before and after the procedure and on different following days. DISCUSSION: Esketamine can reduce tussis occurrence with good tolerability and relax the bronchus and also provides high clearance rates and low possibility of adverse reactions. We aim to demonstrate that the combination of esketamine with propofol for sedation in patients subjected to upper GI procedure is nevertheless superior to only administration of propofol or a combination of propofol with other anaesthetics, such as opioids or lidocaine.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov. NCT05497492 , Registered 09 August 2022.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesPropofolAdolescentEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansKetamineLidocaineMulticenter Studies as TopicNauseaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSufentanilVomitingEsketamineHypnotics and SedativesKetamineLidocainePropofolSufentanilEsketaminePropofolTussis reflectionUpper GI

Identifiers

PMID38178168
PMCPMC10768256
OpenAlexW4390580156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.