Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178128›Full record

Observational studyRespiratory research2024

Inspiratory-expiratory variation of pleural line thickness in neonates with and without acute respiratory failure.

Barbara Loi, Pasquale Fabio Barra, Laura Vivalda, Francesco Raimondi, Daniele De Luca

Open access · goldAbstract readLetterObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara LoiDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Béclère" Medical Center, Paris- Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.
Pasquale Fabio BarraDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Béclère" Medical Center, Paris- Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.
Laura VivaldaDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Béclère" Medical Center, Paris- Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.
Francesco RaimondiDivision of Neonatology, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Università "Federico II" di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Daniele De LucaDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A.Béclère" Medical Center, Paris- Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France. dm.deluca@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3846-4834
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are relatively few data about the ultrasound evaluation of pleural line in patients with respiratory failure. We measured the pleural line thickness during different phases of the respiratory cycle in neonates with and without acute respiratory failure as we hypothesized that this can significantly change.

methodsProspective, observational, cohort study performed in an academic tertiary neonatal intensive care unit recruiting neonates with transient tachypnoea of the neonate (TTN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) or neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS). Neonates with no lung disease (NLD) were also recruited as controls. Pleural line thickness was measured with high-frequency ultrasound at end-inspiration and end-expiration by two different raters.

resultsPleural line thickness was slightly but significantly higher at end-expiration (0.53 [0.43-0.63] mm) than at end-inspiration (0.5 [0.4-0.6] mm; p = 0.001) for the whole population. End-inspiratory (NLD: 0.45 [0.38-0.53], TTN: 0.49 [0.43-0.59], RDS: 0.53 [0.41-0.62], NARDS: 0.6 [0.5-0.7] mm) and -expiratory (NLD: 0.47 [0.42-0.56], TTN: 0.48 [0.43-0.61], RDS: 0.53 [0.46-0.65], NARDS: 0.61 [0.54-0.72] mm) thickness were significantly different (overall p = 0.021 for both), between the groups although the absolute differences were small. The inter-rater agreement was optimal (ICC: 0.95 (0.94-0.96)). Coefficient of variation was 2.8% and 2.5% for end-inspiratory and end-expiratory measurements, respectively. These findings provide normative data of pleural line thickness for the most common forms of neonatal acute respiratory failure and are useful to design future studies to investigate possible clinical applications.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornRespiratory InsufficiencyCohort StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornProspective StudiesInfantsPleuraRespiratory distressSpontaneous breathingUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38178128
PMCPMC10765855
OpenAlexW4390585776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.