Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178119›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Knowledge, attitudes, practices and barriers of medical research among undergraduate medical students in Jordan: a cross-sectional survey.

Mohammad Abusamak, Shahd AlQato, Hala Hani Alrfooh, Ruba Altheeb, Lujain Bazbaz, Rand Suleiman, Amjad Almansi, Alyaman Karajeh, Asem Alkhalaileh, Rasmieh Al-Amer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad AbusamakFaculty of Medicine, Department of Special Surgery, Al-Balqa Applied University, AlSalt, Jordan. mabusamak@bau.edu.jo.
Shahd AlQatoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Special Surgery, Al-Balqa Applied University, AlSalt, Jordan.
Hala Hani AlrfoohFaculty of Medicine, Department of Special Surgery, Al-Balqa Applied University, AlSalt, Jordan.
Ruba AltheebFaculty of Medicine, Department of Special Surgery, Al-Balqa Applied University, AlSalt, Jordan.
Lujain BazbazFaculty of Medicine, Department of Special Surgery, Al-Balqa Applied University, AlSalt, Jordan.
Rand SuleimanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Special Surgery, Al-Balqa Applied University, AlSalt, Jordan.
Amjad AlmansiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Special Surgery, Al-Balqa Applied University, AlSalt, Jordan.
Alyaman KarajehFaculty of Medicine, Department of Special Surgery, Al-Balqa Applied University, AlSalt, Jordan.
Asem AlkhalailehFaculty of Medicine, Department of Special Surgery, Al-Balqa Applied University, AlSalt, Jordan.
Rasmieh Al-AmerFaculty of Nursing, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Al-Balqa Applied University · JOYarmouk University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrating medical students in research at an early stage of their program is a crucial step to enhance the ability of future physicians to employ critical thinking and problem-solving processes, which in turn improves patients' health outcomes.

methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was administered to medical school students at Al-Balqa Applied University. This study aims to analyze the attitudes, practices, and barriers faced by medical students in regard to engaging in medical research.

resultsA total of 333 students participated in the study with a mean age of 21.2 ± 1.5 years. A total of 60.1% were females. Female students had significantly higher knowledge scores (µ = 3.97, SD ± 1.81, P = 0.009) than males (µ = 3.44, SD ± 1.69). As students progress to higher academic years of their clinical program, their knowledge in research significantly increases in comparison to their knowledge in basic medical years (P < 0.001). Student age and academic year significantly correlated with the knowledge scores; each additional year of study increased the knowledge score by 0.25 (β = 0.25, P < 0.001, R

conclusionsMedical students demonstrated a positive attitude toward research starting from their second year of study, despite having limited knowledge on the topic. They identified barriers that could be utilized to promote greater involvement of students in research. The implications for clinical practice suggest that policymakers and educators should consider the outcomes of this study and implement improvements in medical education, specifically by encouraging the early participation of students in the research process.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansJordanMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudesBarriersKnowledgeMedical researchStudentsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID38178119
PMCPMC10768081
OpenAlexW4390578298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.