Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178081›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Blended teaching mode based on small private online course and case-based learning in analgesia and sedation education in China: a comparison with an offline mode.

Shu Li, Longxiang Su, Ran Lou, Ying Liu, Hua Zhang, Li Jiang, Chinese Analgesia and Sedation Education and Research (CASER) group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shu LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Longxiang SuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ran LouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ying LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou, China.
Hua ZhangResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li JiangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. casergroup@aliyun.com.
Chinese Analgesia and Sedation Education and Research (CASER) group

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81900076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandardized training for pain, agitation-sedation, and delirium (PAD) management is urgently needed for Chinese intensivists' continuing education. Since 2020, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Chinese Analgesia and Sedation Education and Research (CASER) group has used an online blended teaching mode based on a small private online course (SPOC) and case-based learning (CBL). This study evaluated whether an online blended teaching mode has similar effects on PAD management training when an offline mode cannot be used. MATERIALS AND

methodsSince 2020, the CASER group has provided offline training and online SPOC&CBL training three times each, targeting intensivists and ICU nurses in China. All participants were divided into an offline group and SPOC&CBL group. A final examination was offered in each training session to assess the students' mastery of professional knowledge. Teachers' and students' perceptions regarding the online SPOC&CBL mode were evaluated through questionnaires.

resultsOf all participants (n = 117), 106 completed all examinations and questionnaires. Most participants were aged 31-40 years (53, 50.0%), had an academic degree (60, 56.6%), and worked in a tertiary hospital (100, 94.34%). We assessed the learning effect on participants from two aspects: theory and clinical practice. There was no significant difference between the SPOC&CBL and offline groups in terms of theoretical, case analysis, and total scores (p > 0.05). In terms of the participants' perceptions regarding the SPOC&CBL mode, 91.5% considered the online mode to be a useful and accessible alternative to improve knowledge and skills. A total of 95.7% of the participants believed that they could interact well with group members, and 87.2% believed that they had a good degree of participation. Of these participants, 76.6% believed that they had received valuable learning resources. All instructors believed that the SPOC&CBL mode was more flexible than the offline mode in terms of teaching time and location, and they were all willing to carry out training with the SPOC&CBL mode.

conclusionCompared to the offline mode, the SPOC&CBL mode can also enhance participants' knowledge and skills and meets their expectations. Therefore, an online mode can be considered a potential method in PAD management education in China.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaPandemicsChinaEducational StatusHumansPainCBLPAD managementPostgraduate medical educationSPOC

Identifiers

PMID38178081
PMCPMC10768422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.