Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178078›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2024

Investing in midwifery for sustainable development goals in low- and middle-income countries: a cost-benefit analysis.

Chakib Boukhalfa, Brahim Ouakhzan, Hanane Masbah, Leila Acharai, Saad Zbiri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
20.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chakib BoukhalfaNational School of Public Health, Rue Lamfadel Cherkaoui, Madinat Al Irfane, Rabat, BP 6329, Morocco. chakib.boukhalfa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6562-4189
Brahim OuakhzanHuman Resources Direction, Ministry of Health and Social Protection, Rabat, Morocco.
Hanane MasbahHuman Resources Direction, Ministry of Health and Social Protection, Rabat, Morocco.
Leila AcharaiUnited Nations Population Fund, Rabat, Morocco.
Saad ZbiriInternational School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health, Casablanca, Morocco. szbiri@um6ss.ma.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-0577
Ministère de la Santé · MAMohammed V University · MANational School of Architecture · MA

Funding

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) contract number: ICC/2021/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal and neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries is frequently caused by inadequate management of obstetric and neonatal complications and a shortage of skilled health workers. The availability of these workers is essential for effective and high-quality healthcare. To meet the needs of sexual, reproductive, maternal, new-born, child, and adolescent health by 2030, more than one million health workers, including 900 000 midwives, are required globally. Despite this, uncertainty persists regarding the return on investment in the health workforce.

methodsThe objective of this research was to determine the cost-benefit ratio of increasing investment in midwifery in Morocco from 2021 to 2030. A comparative analysis was conducted between scenarios "with" and "without" the additional investment. The costs and benefits were estimated using relevant data from national and international sources.

resultsFollowing the International Confederation of Midwives' recommendations, it is advised that Morocco recruit 760 midwives annually to achieve 95% of universal health coverage. This increase in midwifery could result in saving 120 593 lives by 2030, including reducing maternal deaths by 3 201, stillbirths by 48 399, and neonatal deaths by 68 993. The estimated economic benefit of investing in midwives was US$ 10 152 287 749, while the total cost was US$ 638 288 820. Consequently, the cost-benefit ratio was calculated as 15.91, indicating that investing in midwifery would provide 16 times more benefits than costs.

conclusionIncreasing investment in midwifery appears to be an efficient strategy for achieving comprehensive maternal and child health coverage in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Cost-benefit analysisInvestmentMaternal and child healthMidwiferyMoroccoSustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID38178078
PMCPMC10768217
OpenAlexW4390578634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.