Observational studyBMC geriatrics2024
Improving quality of life in the elderly: hearing loss treatment with cochlear implants.
Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03072862 (Cochlear Implant and Healthy Aging), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cochlear Implant and Healthy Aging: A Multinational, Multicentre Observational Study
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of interventions for social isolation, loneliness, and social participation in older adults with hearing loss: results from a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of cochlear implantation on quality of life in patients with age-related hearing loss: a systematic review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Hearing Impairment in Kazakhstan, 2020-2025: Dispensary Registration, Disability Certification, and Cochlear Implantation Response, with Reference to Global Burden of Disease 2021 Modelled Estimates.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Long-Term Use of Cochlear Implants in the Older Adult Population.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Age, Auditory Performance, and Quality of Life in Middle-Aged and Older Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2026Article
- Hearing Loss and Dementia: Risk Factor, Early Marker, or Both?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Montreal cognitive assessment scores predict long-term speech recognition in noise and can be used to guide rehabilitation of cochlear implant users.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Mechanomedicine.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026Article
- How does Frailty Impact Peri-Operative and Speech Recognition Outcomes for Cochlear Implants in Veterans?Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Depression risk after cochlear implantation compared with other rehabilitation strategies in severe hearing loss: a nationwide cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Trends in Adult Cochlear Implant Access and Uptake Across Ten Years of Reported Data.Audiology research · 2026Article
- The association between hearing impairment and incident depression in older adults: a longitudinal analysis.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Article
- Verbal fluency after cochlear implantation: a longitudinal comparison with untreated hearing loss in the ELSA cohort.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Investigating Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation Disparities Through the County Health Rankings System.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Trends and Incidence of Hearing Implant Utilization in Italy: A Population-Based Study.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Changes in Speech Intelligibility, Health-Related Quality of Life, Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety, Perceived Stress, and Tinnitus-Induced Distress, in a Cohort of 227 Adults One Year After Cochlear Implantation: A Decade of Experience from a Single Tertiary Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Speech Production Intelligibility Is Associated with Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Communication strategies to improve older adults'understanding of health information.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Determinants of life satisfaction in older adults with diabetes in China: a national cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Cognitive processing speed improvement after cochlear implantation.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHearing loss impacts health-related quality of life and general well-being and was identified in a Lancet report as one of the largest potentially modifiable factors for the prevention of age-related dementia. There is a lack of robust data on how cochlear implant treatment in the elderly impacts quality of life. The primary objective was to measure the change in health utility following cochlear implantation in individuals aged ≥ 60 years.
methodsThis study uniquely prospectively recruited a large multinational sample of 100 older adults (mean age 71.7 (SD7.6) range 60-91 years) with severe to profound hearing loss. In a repeated-measures design, pre and post implant outcome measures were analysed using mixed-effect models. Health utility was assessed with the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3). Subjects were divided into groups of 60-64, 65-74 and 75 + years.
resultsAt 18 months post implant, the mean HUI3 score improved by 0.13 (95%CI: 0.07-0.18 p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the HUI3 between age groups (F[2,9228] = 0.53, p = 0.59). The De Jong Loneliness scale reduced by an average of 0.61 (95%CI: 0.25-0.97 p < 0.014) and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale improved on average (1.25, 95%CI: 0.85-1.65 p < 0.001). Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening reduced by an average of 8.7 (95%CI: 6.7-10.8, p < 0.001) from a significant to mild-moderate hearing handicap. Age was not a statistically significant factor for any of the other measures (p > 0.20). At baseline 90% of participants had no or mild depression and there was no change in mean depression scores after implant. Categories of Auditory perception scale showed that all subjects achieved a level of speech sound discrimination without lip reading post implantation (level 4) and at least 50% could use the telephone with a known speaker.
conclusionsBetter hearing improved individuals' quality of life, ability to communicate verbally and their ability to function independently. They felt less lonely and less handicapped by their hearing loss. Benefits were independent of age group. Cochlear implants should be considered as a routine treatment option for those over 60 years with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ( http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ ), 7 March 2017, NCT03072862.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.