Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178036›Full record

Observational studyBMC geriatrics2024

Improving quality of life in the elderly: hearing loss treatment with cochlear implants.

D Cuda, M Manrique, Á Ramos, M Marx, R Bovo, R Khnifes, O Hilly, J Belmin, G Stripeikyte, P L Graham and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03072862 (Cochlear Implant and Healthy Aging), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03072862 completednot on this map

Cochlear Implant and Healthy Aging: A Multinational, Multicentre Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCochlearRan2017 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsHearing LossArmsCommercial Nucleus Cochlear Implant Systems
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Montreal cognitive assessment scores predict long-term speech recognition in noise and can be used to guide rehabilitation of cochlear implant users.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Mechanomedicine.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  9. How does Frailty Impact Peri-Operative and Speech Recognition Outcomes for Cochlear Implants in Veterans?Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The association between hearing impairment and incident depression in older adults: a longitudinal analysis.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Investigating Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implantation Disparities Through the County Health Rankings System.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 7 countries.

D CudaOspedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy.
M ManriqueClinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Á RamosComplejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
M MarxHôpital Purpan, CHU, Toulouse, France.
R BovoAzienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padova, Italy.
R KhnifesBnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
O HillySackler Faculty of Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tikva, Israel.
J BelminSorbonne Université Pierre and Hôpital Charles Foix, Paris, France.
G StripeikyteCochlear AG, Basel, Switzerland.
P L GrahamMacquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
C J JamesCochlear France SA, Toulouse, France.
P V GreenhamGreenham Research Consulting Ltd, Ashbury, SN6 8LP, UK. paulagreenham@gmail.com.
I MosnierUnité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, ORL, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université - Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
AM Technology (United Kingdom) · GBAzienda Ospedale - Università Padova · ITBnai Zion Medical Center · ILClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESCochlear (France) · FRCochlear (Switzerland) · CHGuglielmo da Saliceto Hospital · ITHôpital Purpan · FRHospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria · ESInserm · FRMacquarie University · AUSorbonne Université · FRTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHearing loss impacts health-related quality of life and general well-being and was identified in a Lancet report as one of the largest potentially modifiable factors for the prevention of age-related dementia. There is a lack of robust data on how cochlear implant treatment in the elderly impacts quality of life. The primary objective was to measure the change in health utility following cochlear implantation in individuals aged ≥ 60 years.

methodsThis study uniquely prospectively recruited a large multinational sample of 100 older adults (mean age 71.7 (SD7.6) range 60-91 years) with severe to profound hearing loss. In a repeated-measures design, pre and post implant outcome measures were analysed using mixed-effect models. Health utility was assessed with the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3). Subjects were divided into groups of 60-64, 65-74 and 75 + years.

resultsAt 18 months post implant, the mean HUI3 score improved by 0.13 (95%CI: 0.07-0.18 p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the HUI3 between age groups (F[2,9228] = 0.53, p = 0.59). The De Jong Loneliness scale reduced by an average of 0.61 (95%CI: 0.25-0.97 p < 0.014) and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale improved on average (1.25, 95%CI: 0.85-1.65 p < 0.001). Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening reduced by an average of 8.7 (95%CI: 6.7-10.8, p < 0.001) from a significant to mild-moderate hearing handicap. Age was not a statistically significant factor for any of the other measures (p > 0.20). At baseline 90% of participants had no or mild depression and there was no change in mean depression scores after implant. Categories of Auditory perception scale showed that all subjects achieved a level of speech sound discrimination without lip reading post implantation (level 4) and at least 50% could use the telephone with a known speaker.

conclusionsBetter hearing improved individuals' quality of life, ability to communicate verbally and their ability to function independently. They felt less lonely and less handicapped by their hearing loss. Benefits were independent of age group. Cochlear implants should be considered as a routine treatment option for those over 60 years with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ( http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ ), 7 March 2017, NCT03072862.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessHearing LossSpeech PerceptionActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeCochlear implantCognitionHealth utilityHealthy agingHearingHearing aidOutcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38178036
PMCPMC10768457
OpenAlexW4390579007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.