Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38178014›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2024

Detention of children and adolescents under mental health legislation: a scoping review of prevalence, risk factors, and legal frameworks.

Lisa Schölin, Zack Tucker, Arun Chopra, Rohan Borschmann, Colin McKay

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa SchölinCentre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. lisa.scholin@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1348-672X
Zack TuckerMasters student at University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Arun ChopraMental Welfare Commission for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5895-0645
Rohan BorschmannCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0365-7775
Colin McKayCentre for Mental Health and Capacity Law, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor individuals with severe mental illness, involuntary assessment and/or treatment (hereafter detention) can be a necessary intervention to support recovery and may even be lifesaving. Despite this, little is known about how often these interventions are used for children and adolescents.

methodsThis global scoping review set out to: (1) map the current evidence around mental health detentions of children and adolescents (< 18 years); (2) identify the clinical, sociodemographic, and behavioural factors associated with detention; and (3) document the views of professionals and young people on the implementation of mental health legislation.

resultsAfter searching databases of peer-reviewed literature and citation chaining, 42 articles from 15 jurisdictions were included. About one fifth of psychiatric admissions in national register data were detentions, however trends were only available for a few high-income Western countries. The circumstances justifying detention and the criteria authorising detention varied between studies, with a mix of clinical factors and observed behaviours reported as the reason(s) warranting/precipitating a detention. Particular groups were more likely to experience detention, such as children and adolescents from minority ethnic communities and those with a documented history of abuse. There was a notable absence of qualitative research exploring the views of professionals or children and adolescents on detention.

conclusionFurther research is needed to explore the impact of detention on those aged < 18 years, including national register-based studies and qualitative studies. This is particularly relevant in nations currently undergoing legislative reform.

Indexed as

Involuntary CommitmentMental DisordersMental HealthAdolescentChildHumansMinority GroupsPrevalenceRisk FactorsAdolescentsChildrenCompulsionInvoluntary hospitalisationMental health detentionMental health legislation

Identifiers

PMID38178014
PMCPMC10765764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.