Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38177650›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Predictive model for a second hip fracture occurrence using natural language processing and machine learning on electronic health records.

Ricardo Larrainzar-Garijo, Esther Fernández-Tormos, Carlos Alberto Collado-Escudero, María Alcantud Ibáñez, Fernando Oñorbe-San Francisco, Judith Marin-Corral, David Casadevall, David Donaire-Gonzalez, Luisa Martínez-Sanchez, Lucia Cabal-Hierro and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Large language models and rheumatology: are we there yet?Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025
    Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ricardo Larrainzar-GarijoOrthopedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Medical School, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Esther Fernández-TormosOrthopedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Alberto Collado-EscuderoOrthopedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
María Alcantud IbáñezGeriatric Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Medical School, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Oñorbe-San FranciscoOrthopedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Judith Marin-CorralSavana Research Group: Medsavana & Savana Research S.L., Madrid, Spain.
David CasadevallSavana Research Group: Medsavana & Savana Research S.L., Madrid, Spain.
David Donaire-GonzalezSavana Research Group: Medsavana & Savana Research S.L., Madrid, Spain.
Luisa Martínez-SanchezSavana Research Group: Medsavana & Savana Research S.L., Madrid, Spain.
Lucia Cabal-HierroSavana Research Group: Medsavana & Savana Research S.L., Madrid, Spain.
Diego BenaventSavana Research Group: Medsavana & Savana Research S.L., Madrid, Spain. dbenavent@savanamed.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9119-5330
Fátima BrañasGeriatric Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Medical School, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip fractures (HFx) are associated with a higher morbidity and mortality rates, leading to a significant reduction in life quality and in limitation of patient´s mobility. The present study aimed to obtain real-world evidence on the clinical characteristics of patients with an initial and a second hip fracture (HFx) and develop a predictive model for second HFx using artificial intelligence. Electronic health records from one hospital centre in Spain from January 2011 to December 2019 were analysed using EHRead® technology, based on natural language processing and machine learning. A total of 1,960 patients with HFx were finally included during the study period after meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria. From this total, 1835 (93.6%) patients were included in the HFx subgroup, while 124 (6.4%) were admitted to the second HFx (2HFx) subgroup. The mean age of the participants was 84 years and 75.5% were female. Most of comorbidities were more frequently identified in the HFx group, including hypertension (72.0% vs. 67.2%), cognitive impairment (33.0% vs. 31.2%), diabetes mellitus (28.7% vs. 24.8%), heart failure (27.6% vs. 22.4%) and chronic kidney disease (26.9% vs. 16.0%). Based on clinical criteria, 26 features were selected as potential prediction factors. From there, 16 demographics and clinical characteristics such as comorbidities, medications, measures of disabilities for ambulation and type of refracture were selected for development of a competitive risk model. Specifically, those predictors with different associated risk ratios, sorted from higher to lower risk relevance were visual deficit, malnutrition, walking assistance, hypothyroidism, female sex, osteoporosis treatment, pertrochanteric fracture, dementia, age at index, osteoporosis, renal failure, stroke, COPD, heart disease, anaemia, and asthma. This model showed good performance (dependent AUC: 0.69; apparent performance: 0.75) and could help the identification of patients with higher risk of developing a second HFx, allowing preventive measures. This study expands the current available information of HFx patients in Spain and identifies factors that exhibit potential in predicting a second HFx among older patients.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporosisAged, 80 and overArtificial IntelligenceElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleNatural Language ProcessingRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38177650
PMCPMC10766963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.