Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38177459›Full record

ArticleNature cancer2024

Multiregion sampling of de novo metastatic prostate cancer reveals complex polyclonality and augments clinical genotyping.

Evan W Warner, Kim Van der Eecken, Andrew J Murtha, Edmond M Kwan, Cameron Herberts, Joonatan Sipola, Sarah W S Ng, Xinyi E Chen, Nicolette M Fonseca, Elie Ritch and 15 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Advances in spatial omics for the analysis of prostate cancer.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Evan W Warner *Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kim Van der Eecken *Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Andrew J Murtha *Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Edmond M KwanDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7053-680X
Cameron HerbertsDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9929-8374
Joonatan SipolaProstate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland.
Sarah W S NgDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7647-6940
Xinyi E ChenDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nicolette M FonsecaDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Elie RitchDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Elena SchönlauDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Cecily Q BernalesDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gráinne DonnellanDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Aslı D MunzurDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Karan ParekhDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kevin BejaDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Amanda WongDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sofie VerbekeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Nicolaas LumenDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jo Van DorpeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Bram De LaereDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Matti AnnalaDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gillian VandekerkhoveDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5606-0908
Piet OstDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-4848
Alexander W WyattDepartment of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. awwyatt@mail.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2399-0329
University of British Columbia · CAGhent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BEBC Cancer Agency · CATampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De novo metastatic prostate cancer is highly aggressive, but the paucity of routinely collected tissue has hindered genomic stratification and precision oncology. Here, we leveraged a rare study of surgical intervention in 43 de novo metastatic prostate cancers to assess somatic genotypes across 607 synchronous primary and metastatic tissue regions plus circulating tumor DNA. Intra-prostate heterogeneity was pervasive and impacted clinically relevant genes, resulting in discordant genotypes between select primary restricted regions and synchronous metastases. Additional complexity was driven by polyclonal metastatic seeding from phylogenetically related primary populations. When simulating clinical practice relying on a single tissue region, genomic heterogeneity plus variable tumor fraction across samples caused inaccurate genotyping of dominant disease; however, pooling extracted DNA from multiple biopsy cores before sequencing can rescue misassigned somatic genotypes. Our results define the relationship between synchronous treatment-sensitive primary and metastatic lesions in men with de novo metastatic prostate cancer and provide a framework for implementing genomics-guided patient management.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyGenotypeHumansMaleProstate

Identifiers

PMID38177459
OpenAlexW4390581782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.