Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38177334›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2024

Personal care product use patterns in association with phthalate and replacement biomarkers across pregnancy.

Emma M Rosen, Danielle R Stevens, Amanda M Ramos, Erin E McNell, Mollie E Wood, Stephanie M Engel, Alexander P Keil, Antonia M Calafat, Julianne Cook Botelho, Elena Sinkovskaya and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Emma M RosenEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0960-7565
Danielle R StevensEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA.
Amanda M RamosDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Erin E McNellEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA.
Mollie E WoodDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Stephanie M EngelDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alexander P KeilDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Antonia M CalafatDivision of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Julianne Cook BotelhoDivision of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elena SinkovskayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Ann PrzybylskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
George SaadeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Alfred AbuhamadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Kelly K FergusonEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA. kelly.ferguson2@nih.gov.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Cancer Institute · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Hazel B Nichols · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
TOXICOLOGYT32ES007126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ILONA JASPERS, Bernard E. Weissman · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
Environmental phthalate exposure in the Human Placenta Project cohortZIAES103344 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FERGUSON, KELLY · 2020 to 2025
$2.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES103344NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHumans are exposed to phthalates, a class of non-persistent chemicals, through multiple products, including personal care and cosmetics. Associations between specific phthalates and product use have been inconsistent. However, determining these connections could provide avenues for exposure reduction.

objectiveExamine the association between patterns of personal care product use and associations with phthalate and replacement biomarkers.

methodsIn the Human Placenta and Phthalates Study, 303 women were enrolled in early pregnancy and followed for up to 8 visits across gestation. At each visit, women completed a questionnaire about product use in the prior 24 hours and contributed urine samples, subsequently analyzed for 18 phthalate and replacement metabolites. At early, mid-, and late pregnancy, questionnaire responses were condensed and repeated metabolite concentrations were averaged. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to determine groups of women with similar use patterns, and weighted associations between group membership and biomarker concentrations were assessed.

resultsLCA sorted women into groups which largely corresponded to: (1) low fragranced product use (16-23% of women); (2) fragranced product and low body wash use (22-26%); 3) fragranced product and low bar soap use (26-51%); and (4) low product use (7-34%). Monoethyl phthalate (MEP) urinary concentrations were 7-10% lower and concentrations of summed di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate metabolites were 15-21% lower among women in the "low fragranced product use" group compared to the population mean. Few other consistent associations between group and biomarker concentrations were noted. IMPACT STATEMENT: Personal care products and cosmetics are a known exposure source for phthalates and potentially represent one of the most accessible intervention targets for exposure reduction. However, in this analysis accounting for concurrent use and fragranced status of products, we did not find any use patterns that corresponded to universally lower levels.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCosmeticsPhthalic AcidsAdultEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHumansMaternal ExposurePregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBiomarkersCosmeticsEnvironmental Pollutantsphthalic acidPhthalic AcidsChemicals in productsEpidemiologyPhthalates

Identifiers

PMID38177334
PMCPMC11303244
OpenAlexW4390586796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.