ArticleNature computational science2023
Batch-effect correction with sample remeasurement in highly confounded case-control studies.
Article in Nature computational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Meta-Analysis as a Framework for Robust Cross-Study Biological Inference.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Microbiome data integration via shared dictionary learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A cautionary tale of batch corrections on confounded microbiome community profiles.iMetaOmics · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Gingival Tissues: Insights Into Gene Expression Profiles.International journal of genomics · 2025Article
- Batch-effect correction with sample remeasurement in highly confounded case-control studies.Nature computational science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Batch effects are pervasive in biomedical studies. One approach to address the batch effects is repeatedly measuring a subset of samples in each batch. These remeasured samples are used to estimate and correct the batch effects. However, rigorous statistical methods for batch-effect correction with remeasured samples are severely underdeveloped. Here we developed a framework for batch-effect correction using remeasured samples in highly confounded case-control studies. We provided theoretical analyses of the proposed procedure, evaluated its power characteristics and provided a power calculation tool to aid in the study design. We found that the number of samples that need to be remeasured depends strongly on the between-batch correlation. When the correlation is high, remeasuring a small subset of samples is possible to rescue most of the power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.