Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38177229›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep learning-based optic disc classification is affected by optic-disc tilt.

Youngwoo Nam, Joonhyoung Kim, Kyunga Kim, Kyung-Ah Park, Mira Kang, Baek Hwan Cho, Sei Yeul Oh, Changwon Kee, Jongchul Han, Ga-In Lee and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial intelligence in pediatric myopia - a narrative review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Youngwoo Nam *Medical AI Research Center, Institute of Smart Healthcare, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joonhyoung Kim *Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyunga Kim *Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Ah ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea. kparkoph@skku.edu.
Mira KangDepartment of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. mira90.kang@samsung.com.
Baek Hwan ChoDepartment of Medical Device Management and Research, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sei Yeul OhDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Changwon KeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Jongchul HanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Ga-In LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Min Chae KangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Dongyoung LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Yeeun ChoiSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hee Jee YunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Hansol ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Jiho KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Soo Jin ChoHealth Promotion Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Dong Kyung ChangDepartment of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy 20011642National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2C1007718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to determine the effect of optic disc tilt on deep learning-based optic disc classification. A total of 2507 fundus photographs were acquired from 2236 eyes of 1809 subjects (mean age of 46 years; 53% men). Among all photographs, 1010 (40.3%) had tilted optic discs. Image annotation was performed to label pathologic changes of the optic disc (normal, glaucomatous optic disc changes, disc swelling, and disc pallor). Deep learning-based classification modeling was implemented to develop optic-disc appearance classification models with the photographs of all subjects and those with and without tilted optic discs. Regardless of deep learning algorithms, the classification models showed better overall performance when developed based on data from subjects with non-tilted discs (AUC, 0.988 ± 0.002, 0.991 ± 0.003, and 0.986 ± 0.003 for VGG16, VGG19, and DenseNet121, respectively) than when developed based on data with tilted discs (AUC, 0.924 ± 0.046, 0.928 ± 0.017, and 0.935 ± 0.008). In classification of each pathologic change, non-tilted disc models had better sensitivity and specificity than the tilted disc models. The optic disc appearance classification models developed based all-subject data demonstrated lower accuracy in patients with the appearance of tilted discs than in those with non-tilted discs. Our findings suggested the need to identify and adjust for the effect of optic disc tilt on the optic disc classification algorithm in future development.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEye AbnormalitiesGlaucomaOptic DiskFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID38177229
PMCPMC10767025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.