Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38177218›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Psychrophiles to control ice-water phase changes in frost-susceptible soils.

Rashed Rahman, Tejo V Bheemasetti, Tanvi Govil, Rajesh Sani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rashed RahmanDepartment of Civil and Architectural and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Tejo V BheemasettiDepartment of Civil and Architectural and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. tejobheemasetti@arizona.edu.
Tanvi GovilDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, 57701, USA.
Rajesh SaniDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD, 57701, USA.
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

National Science Foundation Grant No. 2314099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phase changes of soil water or porous media have a crucial influence on the performance of natural and man-made infrastructures in cold regions. While various methods have been explored to address the impacts of frost-action arising from these phase changes, conventional approaches often rely on chemicals, mechanical techniques, and the reuse of waste materials, which often exhibit certain limitations and environmental concerns. In contrast, certain organisms produce ice-binding proteins (IBPs) or antifreeze proteins (AFPs) to adapt to low temperatures, which can inhibit ice crystal growth by lowering the freezing point and preventing ice crystallization without the need for external intervention. This study explores the potential of three psychrophilic microbes: Sporosarcina psychrophile, Sporosarcina globispora, and Polaromonas hydrogenivorans, to induce non-equilibrium freezing point depression and thermal hysteresis in order to control ice lens growth in frost-susceptible soils. We hypothesize that the AFPs produced by psychrophiles will alter the phase changes of porous media in frost-susceptible soils. The growth profiles of the microbes, the concentration of released proteins in the extracellular solution, and the thermal properties of the protein-mixed soils are monitored at an interval of three days. The controlled soil showed a freezing point of - 4.59 °C and thermal hysteresis of 4.62 °C, whereas protein-treated soil showed a maximum freezing point depression of - 8.54 °C and thermal hysteresis of 7.71 °C. Interestingly, except for the controlled sample, all the protein-treated soil samples were thawed at a negative temperature (minimum recorded at - 0.85 °C). Further analysis showed that the treated soils compared to porous media mixed soil freeze (1.25 °C vs. 0.51 °C) and thaw (2.75 °C vs. 1.72 °C) at extensive temperature gap. This freezing and thawing temperature gap is the temperature difference between the beginning of ice core formation and completed frozen, and the beginning of ice core thawing and completed thawed for the treated soil samples selected from different incubation days. Overall, this study presents a novel bio-mediated approach using psychrophilic microbes to control ice formation in frost-susceptible soils.

Indexed as

SoilWaterAntifreeze ProteinsCold TemperatureFreezingHumansAntifreeze ProteinsSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID38177218
PMCPMC10766620
OpenAlexW4390585121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.