ArticleScientific reports2024
Auto-detection of the coronavirus disease by using deep convolutional neural networks and X-ray photographs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating augmentation-aware manifold smoothing and momentum-adjusted loss for handling class imbalance in thoracic disease detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Infectious Disease Surveillance, Diagnosis, and Prognosis.Viruses · 2025Review
- Exploring the changing landscape of medical imaging: insights from highly cited studies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.European radiology · 2025Article
- NDL-Net: A Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Diagnosing Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome From Chest X-Rays.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The most widely used method for detecting Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is real-time polymerase chain reaction. However, this method has several drawbacks, including high cost, lengthy turnaround time for results, and the potential for false-negative results due to limited sensitivity. To address these issues, additional technologies such as computed tomography (CT) or X-rays have been employed for diagnosing the disease. Chest X-rays are more commonly used than CT scans due to the widespread availability of X-ray machines, lower ionizing radiation, and lower cost of equipment. COVID-19 presents certain radiological biomarkers that can be observed through chest X-rays, making it necessary for radiologists to manually search for these biomarkers. However, this process is time-consuming and prone to errors. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop an automated system for evaluating chest X-rays. Deep learning techniques can be employed to expedite this process. In this study, a deep learning-based method called Custom Convolutional Neural Network (Custom-CNN) is proposed for identifying COVID-19 infection in chest X-rays. The Custom-CNN model consists of eight weighted layers and utilizes strategies like dropout and batch normalization to enhance performance and reduce overfitting. The proposed approach achieved a classification accuracy of 98.19% and aims to accurately classify COVID-19, normal, and pneumonia samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.