Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38177092›Full record

ArticleEquine veterinary journal2025

'I want to be the sort of owner that he wants me to be': Rationales for biosecurity implementation among British horse owners.

Kelsey L Spence, Sarah M Rosanowski, Josh Slater, Jacqueline M Cardwell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Equine veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kelsey L SpenceVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-8598
Sarah M RosanowskiDigital Agriculture, Grasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7950-0029
Josh SlaterMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.
Jacqueline M CardwellVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, UK.
Royal Veterinary College · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Alborada Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHorse owners play a critical role in mitigating the risk of pathogen spread between horses. However, little is known about how they view biosecurity and whether they experience barriers to the uptake of preventive measures.

objectivesTo explore horse owners' attitudes, perceptions, and experiences of biosecurity and identify how these factors shape horse owners' decisions for biosecurity implementation. STUDY

designQualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

methodsInterviews were conducted with 23 horse owners across Great Britain. Participants were purposively selected to include those in different geographic regions, with different management arrangements, and varied length of horse ownership experience. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a critical realist thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants felt a moral obligation to prioritise their horse's happiness, which became a challenge when certain biosecurity measures (e.g., quarantine) were perceived as compromising their horse's happiness or comfort (Theme 1). A lack of biosecurity was the social norm among shared yards and competition venues (Theme 2), which made it difficult for participants to implement biosecurity measures effectively on their own. Combined with the sense of moral obligation participants felt towards their horse, this meant that participants had to 'care double' (i.e., be more vigilant than they would otherwise) to compensate for collective inaction (Theme 3). MAIN LIMITATIONS: Participants may have been more interested in and/or knowledgeable about biosecurity than the general horse owning population.

conclusionsThe findings highlight several challenges that could be addressed to improve biosecurity implementation among horse owners. Efforts to encourage improved uptake of biosecurity measures should focus on communicating how reducing the risk of disease aligns with horse care. Further research on social norms in the horse industry is needed, in addition to identifying strategies to encourage a collective adoption of biosecurity measures.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryHorse DiseasesAdultAnimalsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHorsesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOwnershipUnited Kingdombiosecurityequine infectious diseaseshorsequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID38177092
PMCPMC11616952
OpenAlexW4390598328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.