ArticleHematology, transfusion and cell therapy2024
Application of mass cytometry to characterize hematopoietic stem cells in apheresis products of patients with hematological malignancies.
Article in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Single-Cell Sequencing and Proteomics to Unravel Stem Cell Heterogeneity: Implications for Precision Regenerative Medicine.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a widely used therapy, but its success largely depends on the number and quality of stem cells collected. Current evidence shows the complexity of the hematopoietic system, which implies that, in the quality assurance of the apheresis product, the hematopoietic stem cells are adequately characterized and quantified, in which mass cytometry (MC) can provide its advantages in high-dimensional analysis.
objectiveThis research aimed to characterize and enumerate CD45
methodsAn analytical and cross-sectional study was performed on 31 apheresis products from 15 patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma (n = 9) and non-Hodgkin lymphomas (n = 6) eligible for HSCT. The MC was employed using the MaxPar Kit for stem cell immunophenotyping. The analysis was performed manually in the Kaluza and unsupervised by machine learning in Cytobank Premium.
resultsAn excellent agreement was found between mass and flow cytometry for the relative and absolute counts of CD45
conclusionsThe MC helps to characterize subpopulations of stem cells in apheresis products. It also allows cell quantification by double platform. Unsupervised analysis allows results completion and validation of the manual strategy. The proposed methodology can be extended to apheresis products for purposes other than HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.