Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38176900›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2025

Perspectives on reforming the tobacco tax administration system in Bangladesh to enhance public health.

Rumana Huque, Fatema Kashfi, Ibrahim Khalil, Hamidul Islam, Syed Mahbubul Alam, Nasiruddin Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rumana HuqueARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh rumanah14@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7616-9596
Fatema KashfiARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ibrahim KhalilUniversity of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Hamidul IslamUniversity of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Syed Mahbubul AlamThe Union Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nasiruddin AhmedARK Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-0807-797X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaxation is the most cost-effective instrument to regulate the consumption of tobacco products. However, weak tax administration can compromise the effectiveness of taxation. This paper aimed to understand the process of the current tobacco tax administration system in Bangladesh, identify gaps and outline the policy priorities to strengthen the tobacco tax administration process in Bangladesh.

methodsA sequential qualitative study was conducted in two linked phases: (a) document review and evidence synthesis; and (b) 20 key informant interviews and one workshop with relevant stakeholders to validate the findings generated from both phases.

resultsThe complex tax system combined with weak tax administration leads to tax evasion in Bangladesh. The processes of procuring and collecting banderoles and tax stamps vary between cigarette and biri companies, and across large and small tax-paying companies. The use of banderoles at the factory level is maintained manually, and there is no system to routinely verify the authenticity of banderoles. Many unregistered small-scale tobacco manufacturing units often reuse the banderoles on new packs. Shortage of staff with inadequate training at the National Board of Revenue restricts adequate tobacco market monitoring. Electronic tax stamps and banderoles combined with a secure digital tracking and tracing system should be introduced to better monitor the supply, distribution and sale of tobacco products. Training needs to be provided to develop capacity of relevant officials.

conclusionThe tobacco tax administration needs to be strengthened to increase the government's tobacco tax revenue and protect public health.

Indexed as

Public HealthTaxesTobacco IndustryTobacco ProductsBangladeshCommerceHumansQualitative ResearchLow/Middle income countryPublic policyTaxation

Identifiers

PMID38176900
PMCPMC12128754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.