Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38176872›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Transition of young people from children's into adults' services: what works for whom and in what circumstances - protocol for a realist synthesis.

Pippa Sipanoun, Susie Aldiss, Louise Porter, Sue Morgan, Emma Powell, Faith Gibson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05867745 (Evaluation of the Development of the Burdett National Transition Nursing Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05867745 unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of the Development of the Burdett National Transition Nursing Network

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of SurreyRan2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsYoung People With All Long-term Health ConditionsArmsInterview, Survey, Letter to a friend (autoethnography)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pippa SipanounSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK p.sipanoun@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6329-645X
Susie AldissSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6015-6993
Louise PorterThe Burdett National Transition Nursing Network, England.
Sue MorganLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Emma PowellThe Burdett National Transition Nursing Network, England.
Faith GibsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8125-4584
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe process of transitioning young people from children's or adolescents' health services into adults' services is a crucial time in the lives and health of young people and has been reported to be disjointed rather than a process of preparation in which they are involved. Such transitions not only fail to meet the needs of young people and families at this time of significant change, but they may also result in a deterioration in health, or disengagement with services, which can have deleterious long-term consequences. Despite the wealth of literature on this topic, there has yet to be a focus on what works for whom, in what circumstances, how and why, in relation to METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This realist synthesis will be undertaken in six stages: (1) the scope of the review will be defined; (2) initial programme theories (IPTs) developed; (3) evidence searched; (4) selection and appraisal; (5) data extraction and synthesis; and (6) finally, refine/confirm programme theory. A theory-driven, iterative approach using the 'On Your Own Feet Ahead' theoretical framework, will be combined with an evidence search including a review of national transition policy documents, supplemented by citation tracking, snowballing and stakeholder feedback to develop IPTs. Searches of EMBASE, EMCARE, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycINFO and AMED will be conducted from 2014 to present, supplemented with grey literature, free-text searching (title, abstract and keywords) and citation tracking. Data selection will be based on relevance and rigour and extracted and synthesised iteratively with the aim of identifying and exploring causal links between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. Results will be reported according to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards Quality and Publication Standards. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This realist synthesis forms part of the National Transition Evaluation Study, which has received ethical and regulatory approval (IRAS ID: 313576). Results will be disseminated through peer-review publication, conference presentations and working with healthcare organisations, stakeholder groups and charities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05867745. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023388985.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth FacilitiesAdolescentAdultChildHumansPolicySystematic Reviews as Topicadolescentorganisation of health servicesprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID38176872
PMCPMC10773364
OpenAlexW4390631641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.